» Articles » PMID: 29928438

The First Thermic Treatment Predicts Following Chemoradiation Response with Concurrent Thermal Therapy for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer

Overview
Journal Oncol Lett
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Jun 22
PMID 29928438
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate whether the neoadjuvant chemoradiation response with concurrent thermal therapy for the treatment of rectal cancer can be predicted following the first thermic treatment. Eighty patients with primary rectal adenocarcinoma (≤12 cm from the anal verge) were included in this study. Fifty-four received surgery and pathological response was evaluated. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was administered conventionally once daily 5 times/week. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy consisted of 50 Gy delivered to the planning target volume in 25 fractions. Concurrent neoadjuvant chemotherapy was delivered in 5-day courses. Capecitabine was administered orally at 1,700 mg/m/day for 5 days/week. Thermic treatment was performed using the Thermotron-RF 8 and administered once/week for 5 weeks with 50 min irradiation. Patients with a gross tumor volume (GTV) ≤32 cm and a radiofrequency (RF) output difference (RO difference) ≥77 Watt/min exhibited pathological complete response (pCR) and CR rates of 50 and 75%, respectively. Those with a GTV ≥80 cm and a RO difference ≥77 Watt/min exhibited pCR and CR rates of 42.9 and 42.9%, respectively. The changes in the skin temperature during RF treatment in patients with pCR with a RO difference ≥77 Watt/min increased significantly compared with those of other outcomes, and progressive disease. These data suggest a strategy for predicting which patients will respond best following the first thermic treatment. The results identified that the group of patients with a GTV ≤32 cm and a RO difference ≥77 Watt/min (outputable/heatable patients) may respond best.

References
1.
Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hess C . Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(16):1926-33. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836. View

2.
Zhu J, Gu W, Lian P, Sheng W, Cai G, Shi D . A phase II trial of neoadjuvant IMRT-based chemoradiotherapy followed by one cycle of capecitabine for stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2013; 8:130. PMC: 3680166. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-130. View

3.
Therasse P, Arbuck S, Eisenhauer E, Wanders J, Kaplan R, Rubinstein L . New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92(3):205-16. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205. View

4.
Roh M, Colangelo L, OConnell M, Yothers G, Deutsch M, Allegra C . Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(31):5124-30. PMC: 2773471. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0467. View

5.
Peeters K, Marijnen C, Nagtegaal I, Kranenbarg E, Putter H, Wiggers T . The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007; 246(5):693-701. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000257358.56863.ce. View