» Articles » PMID: 29925605

Predicting Perturbation Patterns from the Topology of Biological Networks

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Jun 22
PMID 29925605
Citations 85
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

High-throughput technologies, offering an unprecedented wealth of quantitative data underlying the makeup of living systems, are changing biology. Notably, the systematic mapping of the relationships between biochemical entities has fueled the rapid development of network biology, offering a suitable framework to describe disease phenotypes and predict potential drug targets. However, our ability to develop accurate dynamical models remains limited, due in part to the limited knowledge of the kinetic parameters underlying these interactions. Here, we explore the degree to which we can make reasonably accurate predictions in the absence of the kinetic parameters. We find that simple dynamically agnostic models are sufficient to recover the strength and sign of the biochemical perturbation patterns observed in 87 biological models for which the underlying kinetics are known. Surprisingly, a simple distance-based model achieves 65% accuracy. We show that this predictive power is robust to topological and kinetic parameter perturbations, and we identify key network properties that can increase up to 80% the recovery rate of the true perturbation patterns. We validate our approach using experimental data on the chemotactic pathway in bacteria, finding that a network model of perturbation spreading predicts with ∼80% accuracy the directionality of gene expression and phenotype changes in knock-out and overproduction experiments. These findings show that the steady advances in mapping out the topology of biochemical interaction networks opens avenues for accurate perturbation spread modeling, with direct implications for medicine and drug development.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Mechanism of Action and Potential Targets of Saorilao-4 Decoction in the Treatment of Pulmonary Fibrosis in Rats by Metabolomics.

Liu J, Song X, Fu X, Niu S, Chang H, Shi S Food Sci Nutr. 2025; 13(2):e4633.

PMID: 39898125 PMC: 11783149. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.4633.


Mathematical models of intercellular signaling in breast cancer.

Adler F, Griffiths J Semin Cancer Biol. 2025; 109:91-100.

PMID: 39890041 PMC: 11858920. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2025.01.005.


Litter quality modulates changes in bacterial and fungal communities during the gut transit of earthworm species of different ecological groups.

Chao H, Zhong L, Schaefer I, Sun M, Junggebauer A, Hu F ISME Commun. 2025; 5(1):ycae171.

PMID: 39882509 PMC: 11778916. DOI: 10.1093/ismeco/ycae171.


Ecological and Functional Changes in the Hindgut Microbiome of Holstein Cows at High Altitudes.

Chen G, Lu H, Huang S, Zhang C, Ma X, Li B Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39858218 PMC: 11758639. DOI: 10.3390/ani15020218.


Enhancing Photosynthetic Carbon Transport in Rice Plant Optimizes Rhizosphere Bacterial Community in Saline Soil.

Zhang W, Yang S, Wei T, Su Y Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(22).

PMID: 39596253 PMC: 11594718. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252212184.


References
1.
Barzel B, Barabasi A . Universality in network dynamics. Nat Phys. 2013; 9. PMC: 3852675. DOI: 10.1038/nphys2741. View

2.
Ideker T, Sharan R . Protein networks in disease. Genome Res. 2008; 18(4):644-52. PMC: 3863981. DOI: 10.1101/gr.071852.107. View

3.
Rolland T, Tasan M, Charloteaux B, Pevzner S, Zhong Q, Sahni N . A proteome-scale map of the human interactome network. Cell. 2014; 159(5):1212-1226. PMC: 4266588. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.050. View

4.
Barabasi A, Oltvai Z . Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet. 2004; 5(2):101-13. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1272. View

5.
Vanunu O, Magger O, Ruppin E, Shlomi T, Sharan R . Associating genes and protein complexes with disease via network propagation. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010; 6(1):e1000641. PMC: 2797085. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000641. View