» Articles » PMID: 29923029

[One-year Results After Cypass Implantation]

Overview
Journal Ophthalmologe
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2018 Jun 21
PMID 29923029
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Cypass Microstent (Transcend Medical, Menlo Park, CA, USA) is a biocompatible polyamide implant that is implanted in the suprachoroidal space and improves the flow of the aqueous humour via the uveoscleral pathway.

Material And Methods: In a retrospective clinical study 162 patients (220 eyes) with an average age of 71.8 (±14.2) years with a mild to moderate glaucoma were treated with a Cypass implant. In the study three groups of patients (group 1, group 2 and group 3) were formed. Group 1 included patients with pseudophakia who received a Cypass implant, group 2 consisted of patients with a Cypass implant combined with phacoemulsification and implantation of an intraocular lens (Phako/HKL) and group 3 included patients who had had multiple eye surgeries before the Cypass implantation. The follow-up period of the study was 1 year.

Results: The mean preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) in group 1 was 20.0 (±8.4) mm Hg and in group 2 was 20.8 (±8.7) mm Hg. The mean IOP fell to 17.7 (±7.1) mm Hg in group 1 (pressure reduction: 11.7%, p < 0.05) and in group 2 to 18.0 (±7.0) mm Hg (pressure reduction: 13.4%, p > 0.05) 12 months postoperatively. The decrease of IOP in group 3 after 1 year was 11.2%. In 20.5% of the cases (45 eyes), additional operative pressure reducing interventions was performed because the target pressure was not achieved.

Conclusion: After 1 year patients in group 2 showed a significantly similar reduction in pressure as group 1. Additionally, both groups showed a reduction in the number of locally applied antiglaucoma agents. The reduction of the IOP in group 3 was not significant after 12 months, in contrast to the other two groups.

Citing Articles

Complications after CyPass® Micro-Stent explantation: a case series.

Habbe K, Kohlhaas M, Fili S Int Ophthalmol. 2024; 44(1):45.

PMID: 38336985 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-02993-2.


PreserFlo™ MicroShunt Versus Ab Externo Canaloplasty in Patients With Moderate to Advanced Open-Angle Glaucoma: 12-Month Follow-Up of a Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Habbe K, Kohlhaas M, Fili S Cureus. 2023; 15(2):e35185.

PMID: 36960244 PMC: 10030049. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35185.


CyPass Micro-Stent Safety and Efficacy at One Year: What Have We Learned?.

Gabbay I, Ruben S J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2020; 13(3):99-103.

PMID: 32435122 PMC: 7221248. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1264.

References
1.
Merayo-Lloves J, Power W, Rodriguez A, Pedroza-Seres M, Foster C . Secondary glaucoma in patients with uveitis. Ophthalmologica. 1999; 213(5):300-4. DOI: 10.1159/000027443. View

2.
Desai M, Lee R . The medical and surgical management of pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2008; 48(4):95-113. PMC: 2632880. DOI: 10.1097/IIO.0b013e318187e902. View

3.
Melamed S, Ben Simon G, Goldenfeld M, Simon G . Efficacy and safety of gold micro shunt implantation to the supraciliary space in patients with glaucoma: a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009; 127(3):264-9. DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.611. View

4.
Gedde S, Schiffman J, Feuer W, Herndon L, Brandt J, Budenz D . Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012; 153(5):789-803.e2. PMC: 4460598. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.026. View

5.
Jordan J . [Minimally invasive iridocorneal angle surgery]. Ophthalmologe. 2012; 109(7):713-23. DOI: 10.1007/s00347-012-2625-9. View