» Articles » PMID: 29922509

The Effect of Recent Competition Between the Native and the Invasive on Display Behavior

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2018 Jun 21
PMID 29922509
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Invasive species are a global threat to biodiversity. Cases where the invasion has been tracked since its beginning are rare, however, such that the first interactions between invasive and native species remain poorly understood. Communication behavior is an integral part of species identity and is subject to selection. Consequently, resource use and direct interference competition between native and invasive species may drive its evolution. Here, we tested the role of interactions between the recently introduced invasive lizard and the native on variation in behavior and communication in Calibishie (Dominica). From May to June 2016, we filmed 122 adult males of both species displaying in banana farms under two contexts (allopatry and sympatry). We then recorded (i) the proportion of time spent displaying and (ii) the relative frequency of dewlap vs. push-up displays. To control for habitat variation, we measured and compared the habitat characteristics (canopy openness and habitat openness) of 228 males in allopatry and sympatry. While the habitat characteristics and total display-time did not differ between the contexts for the two species, the proportion of display-time spent dewlapping by decreased in sympatry. The display of did not differ between the contexts, however. Shifts in microhabitat use, predation pressure, or interspecific interference are potential factors which might explain the behavioral changes in display observed in . This study highlights the role of behavioral traits as a first response of an invasive species to recent competition with a closely related native species.

Citing Articles

Behavioural plasticity in a native species may be related to foraging resilience in the presence of an aggressive invader.

Keiller M, Lopez L, Paijmans K, Wong M Biol Lett. 2021; 17(3):20200877.

PMID: 33726559 PMC: 8086946. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0877.


Ectoparasite extinction in simplified lizard assemblages during experimental island invasion.

Cox C, Alexander S, Casement B, Chung A, Curlis J, Degon Z Biol Lett. 2020; 16(8):20200474.

PMID: 32750271 PMC: 7480156. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0474.


Asymmetric interference competition and niche partitioning between native and invasive Anolis lizards.

Culbertson K, Herrmann N Oecologia. 2019; 190(4):811-820.

PMID: 31312905 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-019-04466-1.


Ontogenetic scaling patterns of lizard skin surface structure as revealed by gel-based stereo-profilometry.

Baeckens S, Wainwright D, Weaver J, Irschick D, Losos J J Anat. 2019; 235(2):346-356.

PMID: 31099429 PMC: 6637707. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13003.

References
1.
Holway , Suarez . Animal behavior: an essential component of invasion biology. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999; 14(8):328-330. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01636-5. View

2.
Nicholson K, Harmon L, Losos J . Evolution of Anolis lizard dewlap diversity. PLoS One. 2007; 2(3):e274. PMC: 1803026. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000274. View

3.
Huber S, De Leon L, Hendry A, Bermingham E, Podos J . Reproductive isolation of sympatric morphs in a population of Darwin's finches. Proc Biol Sci. 2007; 274(1619):1709-14. PMC: 2493575. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0224. View

4.
Eales J, Thorpe R, Malhotra A . Colonization history and genetic diversity: adaptive potential in early stage invasions. Mol Ecol. 2010; 19(14):2858-69. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04710.x. View

5.
Leal . Signalling displays during predator-prey interactions in a Puerto Rican anole, Anolis cristatellus. Anim Behav. 1997; 54(5):1147-54. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0572. View