» Articles » PMID: 29921666

Regulation of CreA-Mediated Catabolite Repression by the F-Box Proteins Fbx23 and Fbx47

Overview
Journal mBio
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2018 Jun 21
PMID 29921666
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The attachment of one or more ubiquitin molecules by SCF (kp-ullin--box) complexes to protein substrates targets them for subsequent degradation by the 26S proteasome, allowing the control of numerous cellular processes. Glucose-mediated signaling and subsequent carbon catabolite repression (CCR) are processes relying on the functional regulation of target proteins, ultimately controlling the utilization of this carbon source. In the filamentous fungus , CCR is mediated by the transcription factor CreA, which modulates the expression of genes encoding biotechnologically relevant enzymes. Although CreA-mediated repression of target genes has been extensively studied, less is known about the regulatory pathways governing CCR and this work aimed at further unravelling these events. The Fbx23 F-box protein was identified as being involved in CCR and the Δ mutant presented impaired xylanase production under repressing (glucose) and derepressing (xylan) conditions. Mass spectrometry showed that Fbx23 is part of an SCF ubiquitin ligase complex that is bridged via the GskA protein kinase to the CreA-SsnF-RcoA repressor complex, resulting in the degradation of the latter under derepressing conditions. Upon the addition of glucose, CreA dissociates from the ubiquitin ligase complex and is transported into the nucleus. Furthermore, casein kinase is important for CreA function during glucose signaling, although the exact role of phosphorylation in CCR remains to be determined. In summary, this study unraveled novel mechanistic details underlying CreA-mediated CCR and provided a solid basis for studying additional factors involved in carbon source utilization which could prove useful for biotechnological applications. The production of biofuels from plant biomass has gained interest in recent years as an environmentally friendly alternative to production from petroleum-based energy sources. Filamentous fungi, which naturally thrive on decaying plant matter, are of particular interest for this process due to their ability to secrete enzymes required for the deconstruction of lignocellulosic material. A major drawback in fungal hydrolytic enzyme production is the repression of the corresponding genes in the presence of glucose, a process known as carbon catabolite repression (CCR). This report provides previously unknown mechanistic insights into CCR through elucidating part of the protein-protein interaction regulatory system that governs the CreA transcriptional regulator in the reference organism in the presence of glucose and the biotechnologically relevant plant polysaccharide xylan.

Citing Articles

A multilayered regulatory network mediated by protein phosphatase 4 controls carbon catabolite repression and de-repression in Magnaporthe oryzae.

Huang Z, Wang Q, Li Y, Huang P, Liao J, Wang J Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):130.

PMID: 39875495 PMC: 11775291. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07581-3.


Advances in fungal sugar transporters: unlocking the potential of second-generation bioethanol production.

Pereira L, Taveira I, Maues D, de Paula R, Silva R Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2025; 109(1):19.

PMID: 39841260 PMC: 11754382. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-025-13408-2.


F-box protein Fbx23 acts as a transcriptional coactivator to recognize and activate transcription factor Ace1.

Liu Z, Ma K, Zhang P, Zhang S, Song X, Qin Y PLoS Genet. 2025; 21(1):e1011539.

PMID: 39836692 PMC: 11750091. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011539.


A novel luciferase-based reporter tool to monitor the dynamics of carbon catabolite repression in filamentous fungi.

Rullke M, Meyer F, Schmitz K, Blase H, Tamayo E, Benz J Microb Biotechnol. 2024; 17(9):e70012.

PMID: 39269439 PMC: 11395683. DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.70012.


Genome-wide transcription landscape of citric acid producing in response to glucose gradient.

Zheng X, Du P, Gao K, Du Y, Cairns T, Ni X Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1282314.

PMID: 37941722 PMC: 10628723. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1282314.


References
1.
Ozcan S, Johnston M . Function and regulation of yeast hexose transporters. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999; 63(3):554-69. PMC: 103746. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.63.3.554-569.1999. View

2.
Horak J . Regulations of sugar transporters: insights from yeast. Curr Genet. 2013; 59(1-2):1-31. DOI: 10.1007/s00294-013-0388-8. View

3.
Watson A, Edmondson D, BONE J, Mukai Y, Yu Y, Du W . Ssn6-Tup1 interacts with class I histone deacetylases required for repression. Genes Dev. 2000; 14(21):2737-44. PMC: 317033. DOI: 10.1101/gad.829100. View

4.
Markina-Inarrairaegui A, Etxebeste O, Herrero-Garcia E, Araujo-Bazan L, Fernandez-Martinez J, Flores J . Nuclear transporters in a multinucleated organism: functional and localization analyses in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Biol Cell. 2011; 22(20):3874-86. PMC: 3192866. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E11-03-0262. View

5.
Broach J . Nutritional control of growth and development in yeast. Genetics. 2012; 192(1):73-105. PMC: 3430547. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.135731. View