» Articles » PMID: 29921609

Effects of Multiple Sclerosis Disease-modifying Therapies on Employment Measures Using Patient-reported Data

Overview
Date 2018 Jun 21
PMID 29921609
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The direct comparative evidence on treatment effects of available multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is limited, and few studies have examined the benefits of DMTs on employment outcomes. We compared the effects of DMTs used in the previous 5 years on improving the work attendance, amount of work and work productivity of people with MS.

Methods: The Australian MS Longitudinal Study collected data from participants on DMTs usage from 2010 to 2015 and whether DMTs contributed to changes in employment outcomes. We classified 11 DMTs into three categories based on their clinical efficacy (β-interferons and glatiramer acetate as category 1; teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate as category 2; fingolimod, natalizumab, alemtuzumab and mitoxantrone as category 3). Each DMT used by a participant was treated as one observation and analysed by log-multinomial regression.

Results: Of the 874 participants included, 1384 observations were generated. Those who used category 3 (higher efficacy) DMTs were 2-3 times more likely to report improvements in amount of work, work attendance and work productivity compared with those who used category 1 (classical injectable) DMTs. Natalizumab was associated with superior beneficial effects on patient-reported employment outcomes than fingolimod (RR=1.76, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.03 for increased work attendance and RR=1.46, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.10 for increased work productivity).

Conclusions: Those using the higher efficacy (category 3) DMTs, particularly fingolimod and natalizumab, reported significant increases in amount of work, work attendance and work productivity, suggesting they have important beneficial effects on work life in people with MS.

Citing Articles

Beyond lines of treatment: embracing early high-efficacy disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis management.

Oreja-Guevara C, Martinez-Yelamos S, Eichau S, Llaneza M, Martin-Martinez J, Pena-Martinez J Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2024; 17:17562864241284372.

PMID: 39483817 PMC: 11526321. DOI: 10.1177/17562864241284372.


Bioelectronic Medicines-A Novel Approach of Therapeutics in Current Epoch.

Kumar A, Ashawat M, Pandit V, Kumar P Curr Pharm Des. 2024; 31(3):163-178.

PMID: 39313906 DOI: 10.2174/0113816128326489240827100537.


Recent trends in disease-modifying therapy use and associated sickness absence and disability pension among people with multiple sclerosis in Sweden.

Teni F, Machado A, Fink K, Gyllensten H, Hillert J, Friberg E Mult Scler. 2024; 30(3):419-431.

PMID: 38243631 PMC: 10935615. DOI: 10.1177/13524585231225929.


Switching to second line MS disease-modifying therapies is associated with decreased relapse rate.

Marriott J, Ekuma O, Fransoo R, Marrie R Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1243589.

PMID: 37745666 PMC: 10511745. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1243589.


Validation of the EQ-5D-5L and psychosocial bolt-ons in a large cohort of people living with multiple sclerosis in Australia.

Campbell J, Ahmad H, Chen G, van der Mei I, Taylor B, Claflin S Qual Life Res. 2022; 32(2):553-568.

PMID: 36036311 PMC: 9911481. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03214-y.