» Articles » PMID: 29921272

Studying Complexity in Health Services Research: Desperately Seeking an Overdue Paradigm Shift

Overview
Journal BMC Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Jun 21
PMID 29921272
Citations 285
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Complexity is much talked about but sub-optimally studied in health services research. Although the significance of the complex system as an analytic lens is increasingly recognised, many researchers are still using methods that assume a closed system in which predictive studies in general, and controlled experiments in particular, are possible and preferred. We argue that in open systems characterised by dynamically changing inter-relationships and tensions, conventional research designs predicated on linearity and predictability must be augmented by the study of how we can best deal with uncertainty, unpredictability and emergent causality. Accordingly, the study of complexity in health services and systems requires new standards of research quality, namely (for example) rich theorising, generative learning, and pragmatic adaptation to changing contexts. This framing of complexity-informed health services research provides a backdrop for a new collection of empirical studies. Each of the initial five papers in this collection illustrates, in different ways, the value of theoretically grounded, methodologically pluralistic, flexible and adaptive study designs. We propose an agenda for future research and invite researchers to contribute to this on-going series.

Citing Articles

What is improvement science, and what makes it different? An outline of the field and its frontiers.

Reed J, Antonacci G, Armstrong N, Baker G, Crowe S, Harenstam K Front Health Serv. 2025; 4:1454658.

PMID: 40051505 PMC: 11884242. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1454658.


Understanding the implementation of a multidisciplinary intervention using a suite of prescribing safety indicators to improve medication safety in prison healthcare settings: a qualitative study.

Jeffries M, Abuzour A, Ashcroft D, Avery T, Langridge M, Francis G BMJ Open. 2025; 15(3):e086309.

PMID: 40044207 PMC: 11883610. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086309.


A tale of be(com)ing a Sport Nutritionist: Reflexive insights from a researcher-practitioner entering the field.

Bentley M, Patterson L, Backhouse S PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0319164.

PMID: 40014601 PMC: 11867323. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319164.


Development of the Team Evaluation and Assessment Measure Quality Improvement (TEAM-QI) and Proof-Of-Concept Testing in Maternity Teams.

Beck S, Harris J, Green J, Lamb B, Aref-Adib M, Bick D Nurs Health Sci. 2025; 27(1):e70049.

PMID: 39900545 PMC: 11790520. DOI: 10.1111/nhs.70049.


The resilience of parents and carers who administer medicines to children at home: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

Morris S, Pini S, Fylan B, Wilson F, Faulkner H, Alldred D Syst Rev. 2025; 14(1):22.

PMID: 39849614 PMC: 11755963. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02724-9.


References
1.
Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T . Theorising interventions as events in systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2009; 43(3-4):267-76. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-009-9229-9. View

2.
Cohn S, Clinch M, Bunn C, Stronge P . Entangled complexity: why complex interventions are just not complicated enough. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013; 18(1):40-3. DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2012.012036. View

3.
Reed J, Howe C, Doyle C, Bell D . Simple rules for evidence translation in complex systems: A qualitative study. BMC Med. 2018; 16(1):92. PMC: 6009041. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1076-9. View

4.
Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W . Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015; 350:h1258. PMC: 4366184. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1258. View

5.
Cristancho S . Lessons on resilience: Learning to manage complexity. Perspect Med Educ. 2016; 5(3):133-135. PMC: 4908044. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-016-0277-1. View