» Articles » PMID: 29920916

Optical Properties of Contemporary Monolithic CAD-CAM Restorative Materials at Different Thicknesses

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2018 Jun 20
PMID 29920916
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the optical properties of contemporary monolithic CAD-CAM materials with different chemical compositions.

Materials And Methods: Totally, 210 rectangular-shaped, A2 shade specimens (12 × 14 mm) were fabricated from VITA Suprinity T, VITA Enamic T, VITA Mark II, GC Cerasmart LT, Lava Ultimate LT, IPS e.max CAD LT and Prettau Anterior blocks and polished to thicknesses of 0.5 ± 0.01 and 1.0 ± 0.01 mm (n = 15 each material). A dental spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade Compact) was used to calculate the translucency parameter (TP) and opalescence parameter (OP) values of all tested materials. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance, multiple comparison Tukey's test and independent samples t-test (P = .05).

Results: In the 0.5-mm thickness group, GC Cerasmart and Prettau Anterior had the highest and lowest translucency values, respectively. VITA Suprinity had the highest OP value, whereas VITA Mark II and Prettau Anterior had the lowest OP values. In the 1.0-mm thickness group, GC Cerasmart and Lava Ultimate had the highest translucency, whereas Prettau Anterior had the lowest translucency. VITA Suprinity and Prettau Anterior had the highest and lowest OP values, respectively.

Conclusions: The optical properties of monolithic restorative materials were influenced by the type and thickness of the material used.

Clinical Significance: According to the results of this study, monolithic materials with different chemical compositions have revealed different optical properties. To obtain esthetic restorations and provide shade matching with natural dentition especially for anterior teeth, monolithic materials should be carefully chosen.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Properties and Indications of Chairside CAD/CAM Materials in Restorative Dentistry.

Ille C, Jivanescu A, Pop D, Stoica E, Flueras R, Talpos-Niculescu I J Funct Biomater. 2025; 16(2).

PMID: 39997580 PMC: 11856138. DOI: 10.3390/jfb16020046.


Effects of the Presence of Adjacent Tooth and Material Type on the Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Endocrowns Fabricated by the Digital Impression Technique.

Falahchai M, Ardekani F, Musapoor N, Hemmati Y, Asli H Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025; 11(1):e70077.

PMID: 39903787 PMC: 11793159. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.70077.


Translucency and contrast ratio of dimetharcyrlate resin based dental materials after bleaching: an in-vitro study.

Akgul N, Yilmaz M BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1564.

PMID: 39731149 PMC: 11681738. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05383-3.


Effect of CAD-CAM block thickness and translucency on the polymerization of luting materials.

Dogu Kaya B, Ozturk S, Senol A, Kahramanoglu E, Yilmaz Atali P, Tarcin B BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1384.

PMID: 39548438 PMC: 11566408. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05171-z.


Effects of porcelain layer thickness and luting resin cement on the opalescence properties of porcelain veneers.

Li Z, Chen Y, Fu W, Shi C, Lin Y, Wu J BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1243.

PMID: 39425104 PMC: 11490024. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04957-5.