» Articles » PMID: 29917124

Socioeconomic Disparities in Electronic Cigarette Use and Transitions from Smoking

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2018 Jun 20
PMID 29917124
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Socioeconomic disparities have been established for conventional cigarette use, but not for electronic cigarettes. This study estimates socioeconomic gradients in exclusive use of conventional cigarettes, electronic cigarettes, and dual use (ie, use of both products) among adults in the United States.

Methods: Analyses consider nationally representative data on 25- to 54-year-old respondents to the 2014-2016 National Health Interview Surveys (N = 50306). Demographically adjusted seemingly unrelated regression models estimate how two socioeconomic status measures-respondent education and household income-relate to current exclusive use of conventional cigarettes, electronic cigarettes, and dual use.

Results: Conventional cigarette use exhibits negative education and income gradients, consistent with existing research: -12.9 percentage points (confidence interval [CI]: -14.0, -11.8) if college educated, and -9.5 percentage points (CI: -10.9, -8.1) if household income exceeds 400% of the federal poverty level. These gradients are flatter for dual use (-1.4 [CI: -1.8, -0.9] and -1.9 [CI: -2.5, -1.2]), and statistically insignificant for electronic cigarette use (-0.03 [CI: -0.5, 0.4] and -0.3 [CI: -0.8, -0.2]). Limiting the sample to ever-smokers, higher education is associated with a 0.9 percentage point increase in likelihood of exclusive electronic cigarette use at interview (CI: 0.0, 1.9).

Conclusions: Education and income gradients in exclusive electronic cigarette use are small and statistically insignificant, contrasting with strong negative gradients in exclusive conventional cigarette use. Furthermore, more educated smokers are more likely to switch to exclusive e-cigarette use than less educated smokers. Such differential switching may exacerbate socioeconomic disparities in smoking-related morbidity and mortality, but lower the burden of tobacco-related disease.

Implications: Research has not yet established whether socioeconomic disparities in electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use resemble those observed for conventional cigarettes. This article uses nationally representative data on US adults aged 25-54 to estimate income and education gradients in exclusive use of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and dual use. Both gradients are steep and negative for conventional cigarette use, but flat and statistically insignificant for e-cigarette use. Repeating the analysis among ever-smokers indicates that more educated smokers are more likely to transition toward exclusive e-cigarette use than less educated smokers. Such differential substitution may exacerbate disparities in smoking-related morbidity and mortality.

Citing Articles

Examining socio-economic disparities among e-cigarette users and cigarette smokers in three Canadian jurisdictions.

MacDougall S, Asbridge M Drug Alcohol Rev. 2024; 44(2):613-625.

PMID: 39689910 PMC: 11814357. DOI: 10.1111/dar.13988.


Prevalence, demographic, socio-economic, and lifestyle factors associated with cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual use: evidence from the 2017-2021 Scottish Health Survey.

Adebisi Y, Bafail D, Oni O Intern Emerg Med. 2024; 19(8):2151-2165.

PMID: 39026065 PMC: 11582201. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-024-03716-2.


The Effect of Nicotine-Containing Products on Peri-Implant Tissues: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Vamos O, Komora P, Gede N, Hegyi P, Kelemen K, Varga G Nicotine Tob Res. 2024; 26(10):1276-1285.

PMID: 38618685 PMC: 11417124. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntae085.


Tobacco use and its associated factors among middle and old-aged women in India using LASI wave-1 data.

Halder M, Kasemi N, Majumder M PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0298663.

PMID: 38442117 PMC: 10914294. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298663.


Patterns of poly tobacco use among adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study, 2013-2017: a multistate Markov transition analysis.

Shafie Khorassani F, Brouwer A, Hirschtick J, Jeon J, Jimenez-Mendoza E, Meza R Tob Control. 2023; 33(5):603-610.

PMID: 37094934 PMC: 10593910. DOI: 10.1136/tc-2022-057822.