» Articles » PMID: 29915225

Preimplantation Genetic Screening with Spent Culture Medium/Blastocoel Fluid for in Vitro Fertilization

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Jun 20
PMID 29915225
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) detects chromosomal aneuploidy from DNA extracted from trophectodermal biopsy of the embryos before implantation. Although a controlled study showed no difference in pregnancy rates between this invasive cell biopsy technique and a non-biopsied control group, the potential long-term damage by the current PGS method has not be completely ruled out. We therefore tested a less-invasive protocol which utilizes spent culture medium combining with blastocoel fluid (ECB) to assess chromosomal aneuploidy. We compared the new protocol with the currently employed trophectodermal biopsy method against chromosomal information obtained from the remaining embryo. We found that the new technique generated information about aneuploidy that was not entirely identical to obtained from the biopsied trophectoderm or the remaining embryo. As the origins of the DNA extracted from the three sample types were not the same, the significance and interpretation of each result would have its own meaning. The possible implications derived from the ECB results as well as those from cell biopsy were discussed. The effectiveness of this new approach in selecting the best embryo for uterine implantation awaits further long term evaluation.

Citing Articles

The diagnostic accuracy of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in assessing the genetic status of embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen K, Hu Z, Lian Y, Han Y, Zhou X, Li Y Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025; 23(1):39.

PMID: 40069837 PMC: 11895315. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-025-01376-1.


Comparison of Non-Invasive and Minimally Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Using Samples Derived from the Same Embryo Culture.

Bednarska-Czerwinska A, Smolen-Dzirba J, Strychalska A, Sierka W, Wroblewska U, Mermer P J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797117 PMC: 11721003. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010033.


Evolution of Minimally Invasive and Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing: An Overview.

Moustakli E, Zikopoulos A, Skentou C, Bouba I, Dafopoulos K, Georgiou I J Clin Med. 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 38673433 PMC: 11050362. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082160.


Effectiveness of non-invasive chromosomal screening for normal karyotype and chromosomal rearrangements.

Sun B, Wang Y, Sixi-Wen , Zhou L, Zhang C, Wu Z Front Genet. 2023; 14:1036467.

PMID: 36992701 PMC: 10040604. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1036467.


Evaluation of non-invasive gene detection in preimplantation embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Huang B, Luo X, Wu R, Qiu L, Lin S, Huang X J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023; 40(6):1243-1253.

PMID: 36952146 PMC: 10310611. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02760-9.


References
1.
van Echten-Arends J, Mastenbroek S, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar J, Heineman M, van der Veen F . Chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17(5):620-7. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr014. View

2.
Middelburg K, Heineman M, Haadsma M, Bos A, Kok J, Hadders-Algra M . Neurological condition of infants born after in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. Pediatr Res. 2010; 67(4):430-4. DOI: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181d2273e. View

3.
Bay B, Ingerslev H, Lemmen J, Degn B, Rasmussen I, Kesmodel U . Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a national multicenter obstetric and neonatal follow-up study. Fertil Steril. 2016; 106(6):1363-1369.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1092. View

4.
Johnson D, Cinnioglu C, Ross R, Filby A, Gemelos G, Hill M . Comprehensive analysis of karyotypic mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010; 16(12):944-9. PMC: 2989828. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gaq062. View

5.
Yang Z, Liu J, Collins G, Salem S, Liu X, Lyle S . Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet. 2012; 5(1):24. PMC: 3403960. DOI: 10.1186/1755-8166-5-24. View