» Articles » PMID: 29909577

Population Pharmacokinetic Model for Tumescent Lidocaine in Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2018 Jun 18
PMID 29909577
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Tumescent lidocaine anesthesia (TLA) is an opportunity to perform mastectomy for breast cancer without general anesthesia in elderly women. Few reports are available on the pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in a context of TLA during a unilateral mastectomy. The aim of this study was to describe lidocaine pharmacokinetics in elderly women undergoing breast cancer surgery after TLA and to explore the risk of the toxicity of this technique.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted to examine the pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in women undergoing TLA. TLA consists of an intradermal lidocaine instillation (20 mL, 1% [200 mg]) followed by a tumescent lidocaine infiltration (100 mL of 1% lidocaine [1000 mg] and 0.5 mg epinephrine to 1 L Ringer's lactate) via an infusion pump. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) analysis was performed using the nonlinear mixed effects model (NONMEM).

Results: The analysis included 116 observations from 17 women with a median (range) age of 83.4 (60.5-90.0). The median tumescent lidocaine dose was 800 mg (range 375-1000 mg) infused over 48.0 ± 11.0 min. A one-compartment disposition model with first order absorption, two input compartments, and a central elimination best described the pharmacokinetics of lidocaine. The estimates (between subject variability; relative standard error, %) of apparent volume, apparent clearance, tumescent absorption rate, and instillation absorption rate were 195.0 (46.3; 14.5%) L, 24.7 (48.9; 13.3%) L h, 0.28 (39.6; 13.8%) h, and 2.56 (135.3; 44.9%) h, respectively.

Conclusions: This is the first popPK model developed to describe kinetic profiles of TLA. These findings confirm the slow diffusion of lidocaine from the tumescent deposit.

Citing Articles

Utilization of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling in Pharmacoepidemiological Studies: A Systematic Review on Antiarrhythmic and Glucose-Lowering Medicines.

Mohammadi Jouabadi S, Nekouei Shahraki M, Peymani P, Stricker B, Ahmadizar F Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:908538.

PMID: 35795566 PMC: 9251370. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.908538.

References
1.
Klein J . The tumescent technique. Anesthesia and modified liposuction technique. Dermatol Clin. 1990; 8(3):425-37. View

2.
Knudsen K, Beckman Suurkula M, Blomberg S, Sjovall J, Edvardsson N . Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 1997; 78(5):507-14. DOI: 10.1093/bja/78.5.507. View

3.
Mather L, Copeland S, Ladd L . Acute toxicity of local anesthetics: underlying pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic concepts. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005; 30(6):553-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.07.186. View

4.
Ramon Y, Barak Y, Ullmann Y, Hoffer E, Yarhi D, Bentur Y . Pharmacokinetics of high-dose diluted lidocaine in local anesthesia for facelift procedures. Ther Drug Monit. 2007; 29(5):644-7. DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3180eaa10a. View

5.
Savic R, Karlsson M . Importance of shrinkage in empirical bayes estimates for diagnostics: problems and solutions. AAPS J. 2009; 11(3):558-69. PMC: 2758126. DOI: 10.1208/s12248-009-9133-0. View