» Articles » PMID: 29906279

Evidence for a Second Regulatory Binding Site on PspF That is Occupied by the C-terminal Domain of PspA

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Jun 16
PMID 29906279
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

PspA is a key component of the bacterial Psp membrane-stress response system. The biochemical and functional characterization of PspA is impeded by its oligomerization and aggregation properties. It was recently possible to solve the coiled coil structure of a completely soluble PspA fragment, PspA(1-144), that associates with the σ54 enhancer binding protein PspF at its W56-loop and thereby down-regulates the Psp response. We now found that the C-terminal part of PspA, PspA(145-222), also interacts with PspF and inhibits its activity in the absence of full-length PspA. Surprisingly, PspA(145-222) effects changed completely in the presence of full-length PspA, as promoter activity was triggered instead of being inhibited under this condition. PspA(145-222) thus interfered with the inhibitory effect of full-length PspA on PspF, most likely by interacting with full-length PspA that remained bound to PspF. In support of this view, a comprehensive bacterial-2-hybrid screen as well as co-purification analyses indicated a self-interaction of PspA(145-222) and an interaction with full-length PspA. This is the first direct demonstration of PspA/PspA and PspA/PspF interactions in vivo that are mediated by the C-terminus of PspA. The data indicate that regulatory binding sites on PspF do not only exist for the N-terminal coiled coil domain but also for the C-terminal domain of PspA. The inhibition of PspF by PspA-(145-222) was reduced upon membrane stress, whereas the inhibition of PspF by PspA(1-144) did not respond to membrane stress. We therefore propose that the C-terminal domain of PspA is crucial for the regulation of PspF in response to Psp system stimuli.

Citing Articles

Engineered Phage Enables Efficient Control of Gene Expression upon Infection of the Host Cell.

Wei T, Lai W, Chen Q, Sun C Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(1.

PMID: 39796105 PMC: 11720261. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26010250.


Biophysical and Computational Approaches to Unravel pH-Dependent Conformational Change of PspA Assist PspA-PspF Complex Formation in Yersinia enterocolitica.

Roy C, Kumar R, Hossain M, Das A, Datta S Protein J. 2022; 41(3):403-413.

PMID: 35708879 DOI: 10.1007/s10930-022-10061-w.


Evidence for an Adaptation of a Phage-Derived Holin/Endolysin System to Toxin Transport in .

Mehner-Breitfeld D, Rathmann C, Riedel T, Just I, Gerhard R, Overmann J Front Microbiol. 2018; 9:2446.

PMID: 30405545 PMC: 6200909. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02446.

References
1.
Flores-Kim J, Darwin A . The Phage Shock Protein Response. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2016; 70:83-101. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095359. View

2.
Richter S, Bruser T . Targeting of unfolded PhoA to the TAT translocon of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280(52):42723-30. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M509570200. View

3.
Dworkin J, Jovanovic G, Model P . Role of upstream activation sequences and integration host factor in transcriptional activation by the constitutively active prokaryotic enhancer-binding protein PspF. J Mol Biol. 1997; 273(2):377-88. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1317. View

4.
Dworkin J, Jovanovic G, Model P . The PspA protein of Escherichia coli is a negative regulator of sigma(54)-dependent transcription. J Bacteriol. 2000; 182(2):311-9. PMC: 94278. DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.2.311-319.2000. View

5.
Joly N, Engl C, Jovanovic G, Huvet M, Toni T, Sheng X . Managing membrane stress: the phage shock protein (Psp) response, from molecular mechanisms to physiology. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010; 34(5):797-827. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00240.x. View