An Evaluation of the Relationship Among Urine, Air, and Hand Measures of Exposure to Bisphenol A (BPA) in US Manufacturing Workers
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) can be assessed using external and internal exposure measures. We examined the relationship between two measures of external BPA exposure (air and hand-wipe samples) and one of internal exposure (total BPA in urine) for a group of US manufacturing workers.
Methods: During 2013-2014, we recruited 78 workers from six US companies that made BPA or made products with BPA. We quantified BPA in seven urine samples, two full-shift air samples and in pre- and end-shift hand-wipe samples collected from workers over 2 consecutive days. We examined correlations between creatinine-corrected urinary concentrations of total BPA (total BPACR) and BPA levels in air and hand wipes using Pearson's correlation coefficient. We also applied mixed-effects regression models to examine the relationship between total BPACR with BPA in air (urine~air model) and with BPA in end-shift hand wipes (urine~hand model), separately and together (urine~air+hand model), after adjusting for covariates.
Results: End-shift total BPACR strongly correlated with BPA in air (rp = 0.79, P < 0.0001) and nearly as strongly with BPA in end-shift hand wipes (rp = 0.75, P < 0.0001). In mixed-effect models, BPA air concentration and end-shift hand-wipe BPA level were significantly and positively associated with end-shift total BPACR (P < 0.0001 each). We found a significant effect of the Day 1 BPA air concentration on Day 2 total BPACR (P = 0.0104). When BPA air concentration and end-shift hand-wipe BPA level were in the same model, the air concentration (P < 0.0001) was more significant than the hand-wipe level (P = 0.0106).
Conclusion: BPA levels in air and end-shift hand wipes strongly correlated with total BPACR, suggesting that both inhalation and dermal contract were likely exposure routes; however, inhalation, on average, appeared to be a more dominant exposure route than dermal contact for these manufacturing workers.
Tian Z, He Z, Zhang Q, Ding L, Song L, Ren R Heliyon. 2024; 10(16):e35982.
PMID: 39253254 PMC: 11381587. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35982.
Motta G, Thangaraj S, Padmanabhan V Toxics. 2024; 12(1).
PMID: 38250971 PMC: 10818936. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12010015.
Eid R, Alaa Edeen M, Soltan M, Al-Shraim M, Zaki M, Al-Qahtani S Biomedicines. 2023; 11(2).
PMID: 36830956 PMC: 9953522. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11020421.
Samon S, Hammel S, Stapleton H, Anderson K Environ Int. 2022; 169:107339.
PMID: 36116363 PMC: 9713950. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107339.
miRNA changes in the mouse placenta due to bisphenol A exposure.
Mao J, Kinkade J, Bivens N, Rosenfeld C Epigenomics. 2021; 13(24):1909-1919.
PMID: 34841895 PMC: 8649984. DOI: 10.2217/epi-2021-0339.