» Articles » PMID: 29901623

Facet Joint Hypertrophy is a Misnomer: A Retrospective Study

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Jun 15
PMID 29901623
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One of the major causes of lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) has been considered facet joint hypertrophy (FJH). However, a previous study asserted that "FJH" is a misnomer because common facet joints are no smaller than degenerative facet joints; however, this hypothesis has not been effectively demonstrated. Therefore, in order to verify that FJH is a misnomer in patients with LSCS, we devised new morphological parameters that we called facet joint thickness (FJT) and facet joint cross-sectional area (FJA).We collected FJT and FJA data from 114 patients with LSCS. A total of 86 control subjects underwent lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as part of routine medical examinations, and axial T2-weighted MRI images were obtained from all participants. We measured FJT by drawing a line along the facet area and then measuring the narrowest point at L4-L5. We measured FJA as the whole cross-sectional area of the facet joint at the stenotic L4-L5 level.The average FJT was 1.60 ± 0.36 mm in the control group and 1.11 ± 0.32 mm in the LSCS group. The average FJA was 14.46 ± 5.17 mm in the control group and 9.31 ± 3.47 mm in the LSCS group. Patients with LSCS had significantly lower FJTs (P < .001) and FJAs (P < .001).FJH, a misnomer, should be renamed facet joint area narrowing. Using this terminology would eliminate confusion in descriptions of the facet joint.

Citing Articles

The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy.

Lee K, Jeong H, Park C, Kim M, Ryu H, Roh J Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2022; 82(4):862-875.

PMID: 36238060 PMC: 9514398. DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2020.0095.


Quantitative Radiological Characteristics of the Facet Joints in Patients with Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis.

Wang A, Wang T, Zang L, Yuan S, Fan N, Du P J Pain Res. 2022; 15:2363-2371.

PMID: 36003291 PMC: 9393112. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S374720.


In vivo relationships between lumbar facet joint and intervertebral disc composition and diurnal deformation.

Oldweiler A, Martin J Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021; 88:105425.

PMID: 34289433 PMC: 8490326. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105425.


Percutaneous spinal endoscopy with unilateral interlaminar approach to perform bilateral decompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis: radiographic and clinical assessment.

Xue J, Chen H, Zhu B, Li X, Ouyang Z, Li S BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):236.

PMID: 33648479 PMC: 7923329. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04100-3.

References
1.
Lim T, Choi S, Cho H, Kang K, Rhyu C, Chae E . Optimal Cut-Off Value of the Superior Articular Process Area as a Morphological Parameter to Predict Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis. Pain Res Manag. 2017; 2017:7914836. PMC: 5253487. DOI: 10.1155/2017/7914836. View

2.
Hughes A, Makirov S, Osadchiy V . Measuring spinal canal size in lumbar spinal stenosis: description of method and preliminary results. Int J Spine Surg. 2015; 9:3. PMC: 4378259. DOI: 10.14444/2008. View

3.
Genevay S, Atlas S . Lumbar spinal stenosis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 24(2):253-65. PMC: 2841052. DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.001. View

4.
Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim D, Li L, Suri P, Guermazi A . Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J. 2009; 9(7):545-50. PMC: 3775665. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.005. View

5.
Barry M, Livesley P . Facet joint hypertrophy: the cross-sectional area of the superior articular process of L4 and L5. Eur Spine J. 1997; 6(2):121-4. PMC: 3454586. DOI: 10.1007/BF01358744. View