» Articles » PMID: 29900183

Influence of Maximal Running Shoes on Biomechanics Before and After a 5K Run

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2018 Jun 15
PMID 29900183
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Lower extremity injuries are common among runners. Recent trends in footwear have included minimal and maximal running shoe types. Maximal running shoes are unique because they provide the runner with a highly cushioned midsole in both the rearfoot and forefoot. However, little is known about how maximal shoes influence running biomechanics.

Purpose: To examine the influence of maximal running shoes on biomechanics before and after a 5-km (5K) run as compared with neutral running shoes.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Fifteen female runners participated in 2 testing sessions (neutral shoe session and maximal shoe session), with 7 to 10 days between sessions. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data were collected while participants ran along a 10-m runway. After 5 running trials, participants completed a 5K treadmill run, followed by 5 additional running trials. Variables of interest included impact peak of the vertical ground-reaction force, loading rate, and peak eversion. Differences were determined by use of a series of 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance models (shoe × time).

Results: A significant main effect was found for shoe type for impact peak and loading rate. When the maximal shoe was compared with the neutral shoe before and after the 5K run, participants exhibited an increased loading rate (mean ± SE: pre-maximal shoe, 81.15 body weights/second [BW/s] and pre-neutral shoe, 60.83 BW/s [ < .001]; post-maximal shoe, 79.10 BW/s and post-neutral shoe, 61.22 BW/s [ = .008]) and increased impact peak (pre-maximal shoe, 1.76 BW and pre-neutral shoe, 1.58 BW [ = .004]; post-maximal shoe, 1.79 BW and post-neutral shoe, 1.55 BW [ = .003]). There were no shoe × time interactions and no significant findings for peak eversion.

Conclusion: Runners exhibited increased impact forces and loading rate when running in a maximal versus neutral shoe. Because increases in these variables have been associated with an increased risk of running-related injuries, runners who are new to running in a maximal shoe may be at an increased risk of injury.

Clinical Relevance: Understanding the influence of running footwear as an intervention that affects running biomechanics is important for clinicians so as to reduce patient injury.

Citing Articles

Effects of shoe heel height on ankle dynamics in running.

Yawar A, Lieberman D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17959.

PMID: 39095422 PMC: 11297298. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68519-z.


Towards functionally individualised designed footwear recommendation for overuse injury prevention: a scoping review.

Mai P, Robertz L, Robbin J, Bill K, Weir G, Kurz M BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023; 15(1):152.

PMID: 37951935 PMC: 10638717. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-023-00760-x.


PCA of Running Biomechanics after 5 km between Novice and Experienced Runners.

Jiang X, Xu D, Fang Y, Biro I, Baker J, Gu Y Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(7).

PMID: 37508903 PMC: 10376576. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10070876.


Evaluating the Effect of Shoes with Varying Mass on Vertical Ground Reaction Force Parameters in Short-Term Running.

Keshvari B, Alevras S, Mitternacht J, Senner V Int J Exerc Sci. 2023; 15(1):191-205.

PMID: 36896120 PMC: 9987428. DOI: 10.70252/NJOB4479.


Effects of minimalist shoes on pelvic floor activity in nulliparous women during running at different velocities: a randomized cross-over clinical trial.

Garcia-Arrabe M, Garcia-Fernandez P, Ruiz-Ruiz B, Del Prado-Alvarez R, Romero-Morales C, Diaz-Arribas M Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):21218.

PMID: 36481768 PMC: 9732344. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25344-6.


References
1.
Hollander K, Argubi-Wollesen A, Reer R, Zech A . Comparison of minimalist footwear strategies for simulating barefoot running: a randomized crossover study. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0125880. PMC: 4444250. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125880. View

2.
Robertson D, Dowling J . Design and responses of Butterworth and critically damped digital filters. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003; 13(6):569-73. DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(03)00080-4. View

3.
Coetzee D, Albertus Y, Tam N, Tucker R . Conceptualizing minimalist footwear: an objective definition. J Sports Sci. 2017; 36(8):949-954. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1346816. View

4.
Willy R, Davis I . Kinematic and kinetic comparison of running in standard and minimalist shoes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 46(2):318-23. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a595d2. View

5.
Fredericks W, Swank S, Teisberg M, Hampton B, Ridpath L, Hanna J . Lower extremity biomechanical relationships with different speeds in traditional, minimalist, and barefoot footwear. J Sports Sci Med. 2015; 14(2):276-83. PMC: 4424455. View