» Articles » PMID: 29898673

What Do We Know About Frailty in the Acute Care Setting? A Scoping Review

Overview
Journal BMC Geriatr
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2018 Jun 15
PMID 29898673
Citations 115
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The ability of acute care providers to cope with the influx of frail older patients is increasingly stressed, and changes need to be made to improve care provided to older adults. Our purpose was to conduct a scoping review to map and synthesize the literature addressing frailty in the acute care setting in order to understand how to tackle this challenge. We also aimed to highlight the current gaps in frailty research.

Methods: This scoping review included original research articles with acutely-ill Emergency Medical Services (EMS) or hospitalized older patients who were identified as frail by the authors. We searched Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Eric, and Cochrane from January 2000 to September 2015.

Results: Our database search initially resulted in 8658 articles and 617 were eligible. In 67% of the articles the authors identified their participants as frail but did not report on how they measured frailty. Among the 204 articles that did measure frailty, the most common disciplines were geriatrics (14%), emergency department (14%), and general medicine (11%). In total, 89 measures were used. This included 13 established tools, used in 51% of the articles, and 35 non-frailty tools, used in 24% of the articles. The most commonly used tools were the Clinical Frailty Scale, the Frailty Index, and the Frailty Phenotype (12% each). Most often (44%) researchers used frailty tools to predict adverse health outcomes. In 74% of the cases frailty predicted the outcome examined, typically mortality and length of stay.

Conclusions: Most studies (83%) were conducted in non-geriatric disciplines and two thirds of the articles identified participants as frail without measuring frailty. There was great variability in tools used and more recently published studies were more likely to use established frailty tools. Overall, frailty appears to be a good predictor of adverse health outcomes. For frailty to be implemented in clinical practice frailty tools should help formulate the care plan and improve shared decision making. How this will happen has yet to be determined.

Citing Articles

Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on the Impact of a Multicomponent Intervention for Older People With Frailty Discharged From Hospital-A Theory-Based Evaluation.

Rasmussen R, Nilsson L, Holst M, Villumsen M, Andreasen J J Eval Clin Pract. 2025; 31(1):e70042.

PMID: 39999957 PMC: 11858848. DOI: 10.1111/jep.70042.


Comparison of frailty screening tools in predicting length of stay and disability in older patients on internal medicine inpatient wards transferred from the emergency department: A retrospective observational study.

Kayhan Kocak F, Sama M, Fehimoglu H, Emekdas B, Akyol M Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 104(8):e41635.

PMID: 39993093 PMC: 11856884. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041635.


The effect of frailty on postoperative recovery in patients with cardiovascular surgery.

Zengin H, Yildirim N Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 103(52):e41151.

PMID: 39969328 PMC: 11688087. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041151.


The clinical frailty scale is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications and the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis in elderly patients with trimalleolar ankle fractures - a retrospective study.

Zhou Q, Deng W, Zhao M, Zhou W, Chen D, Wang H J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):120.

PMID: 39885561 PMC: 11780978. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05499-4.


Baseline Characteristics of Frailty and Disease Stage in Older People Living With CKD.

Logan B, Pascoe E, Viecelli A, Johnson D, Comans T, Hawley C Kidney Int Rep. 2025; 10(1):120-133.

PMID: 39810773 PMC: 11725818. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.10.009.


References
1.
Bakker F, Persoon A, Bredie S, van Haren-Willems J, Leferink V, Noyez L . The CareWell in Hospital program to improve the quality of care for frail elderly inpatients: results of a before-after study with focus on surgical patients. Am J Surg. 2014; 208(5):735-746. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.04.009. View

2.
Parmar K, Xiu P, Chowdhury M, Patel E, Cohen M . In-hospital treatment and outcomes of heart failure in specialist and non-specialist services: a retrospective cohort study in the elderly. Open Heart. 2015; 2(1):e000095. PMC: 4442175. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000095. View

3.
Adamis D, Treloar A, Martin F, Gregson N, Hamilton G, Macdonald A . APOE and cytokines as biological markers for recovery of prevalent delirium in elderly medical inpatients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007; 22(7):688-94. DOI: 10.1002/gps.1732. View

4.
Kistler E, Nicholas J, Kates S, Friedman S . Frailty and Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Hip Fracture. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2015; 6(3):209-14. PMC: 4536514. DOI: 10.1177/2151458515591170. View

5.
Bennett A, Gnjidic D, Gillett M, Carroll P, Matthews S, Johnell K . Prevalence and impact of fall-risk-increasing drugs, polypharmacy, and drug-drug interactions in robust versus frail hospitalised falls patients: a prospective cohort study. Drugs Aging. 2014; 31(3):225-32. DOI: 10.1007/s40266-013-0151-3. View