» Articles » PMID: 29892208

Procarbazine and CCNU Chemotherapy for Recurrent Glioblastoma with MGMT Promoter Methylation

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Jun 13
PMID 29892208
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: While procarbazine, CCNU (lomustine), and vincristine (PCV) has been an alternative chemotherapy option for malignant gliomas, it is worth investigating whether the combination of only procarbazine and CCNU is comparable because vincristine adds toxicity with uncertain benefit. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of procarbazine and CCNU chemotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) with O-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation.

Methods: Eight patients with recurrent GBM following concurrent chemoradiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ) adjuvant therapy were enrolled in this trial; they received no other chemotherapeutic agents or target therapy. They received CCNU (75 mg/m) on day 1 and procarbazine (60 mg/m) through days 11 and 24 every 4 weeks. The median cycle of CCNU and procarbazine was 3.5 (range: 2-6).

Results: One patient achieved stable disease. The median progression-free survival (PFS) with procarbazine and CCNU chemotherapy was eight weeks (range: 5-73), and the PFS rates were 25% and 12.5% at 16 and 30 weeks, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) from the initial diagnosis to death was 40 months, and the median OS from the administration of procarbazine and CCNU chemotherapy to death was 9.7 months (95% confidence interval: 6.7-12.7). Serious adverse events were found at six visits, and two cases were considered to be grade 3 toxicities.

Conclusion: The efficacy of procarbazine and CCNU chemotherapy is not satisfactory. This study suggests the need to develop other treatment strategies for recurrent and TMZ-refractory GBM. Trial registry at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT017337346.

Citing Articles

High costs, low quality of life, reduced survival, and room for improving treatment: an analysis of burden and unmet needs in glioma.

Pohlmann J, Weller M, Marcellusi A, Grabe-Heyne K, Krott-Coi L, Rabar S Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1368606.

PMID: 38571509 PMC: 10987841. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1368606.


The Next Frontier in Health Disparities-A Closer Look at Exploring Sex Differences in Glioma Data and Omics Analysis, from Bench to Bedside and Back.

Diaz Rosario M, Kaur H, Tasci E, Shankavaram U, Sproull M, Zhuge Y Biomolecules. 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 36139042 PMC: 9496358. DOI: 10.3390/biom12091203.


Alterations in Molecular Profiles Affecting Glioblastoma Resistance to Radiochemotherapy: Where Does the Good Go?.

Vilar J, Christmann M, Tomicic M Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(10).

PMID: 35626024 PMC: 9139489. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102416.


The use of radiosensitizing agents in the therapy of glioblastoma multiforme-a comprehensive review.

Pepper N, Stummer W, Eich H Strahlenther Onkol. 2022; 198(6):507-526.

PMID: 35503461 PMC: 9165247. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01942-1.


Research progress of anti-glioma chemotherapeutic drugs (Review).

Zhou Y, Wang W, Chen N, Wang L, Huang J Oncol Rep. 2022; 47(5).

PMID: 35362540 PMC: 8990335. DOI: 10.3892/or.2022.8312.


References
1.
Greig N, Soncrant T, Shetty H, Momma S, Smith Q, Rapoport S . Brain uptake and anticancer activities of vincristine and vinblastine are restricted by their low cerebrovascular permeability and binding to plasma constituents in rat. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1990; 26(4):263-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF02897227. View

2.
Glas M, Bahr O, Felsberg J, Rasch K, Wiewrodt D, Schabet M . NOA-05 phase 2 trial of procarbazine and lomustine therapy in gliomatosis cerebri. Ann Neurol. 2011; 70(3):445-53. DOI: 10.1002/ana.22478. View

3.
Batchelor T, Mulholland P, Neyns B, Nabors L, Campone M, Wick A . Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(26):3212-8. PMC: 4021043. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.2464. View

4.
Boyle F, Eller S, Grossman S . Penetration of intra-arterially administered vincristine in experimental brain tumor. Neuro Oncol. 2004; 6(4):300-5. PMC: 1872009. DOI: 10.1215/S1152851703000516. View

5.
Woo J, Yang S, Lee Y, Lee S, Kim J, Hong Y . Continuous Low-Dose Temozolomide Chemotherapy and Microvessel Density in Recurrent Glioblastoma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015; 58(5):426-31. PMC: 4688311. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2015.58.5.426. View