» Articles » PMID: 29882811

Impact of First Meal Size During Prolonged Sitting on Postprandial Glycaemia in Individuals with Prediabetes: A Randomised, Crossover Study

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2018 Jun 9
PMID 29882811
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We compared the impact of a high versus low energy intake first meal on glucose and insulin responses during prolonged sitting in individuals with prediabetes. Thirteen adults with overweight/obesity and prediabetes (mean ± SD age: 60 ± 6 years, BMI: 33 ± 4 kg/m²; 2 h OGTT: 8.9 ± 1.1 mmol/L) completed two randomised trials: 10 h uninterrupted sitting, incorporating three meals with matching macronutrient compositions but different energy distributions: High-Energy Breakfast (HE-BF; breakfast: 50%, lunch: 30%, dinner: 20% energy intake), Low-Energy Breakfast (LE-BF: 20%/30%/50% energy intake). Venous blood was sampled from 08:00⁻18:00 h for determination of plasma glucose and insulin concentrations, with 24 h continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Total glucose area under the curve (AUC; +5.7 mmol/L/h, = 0.019) and mean plasma glucose concentrations (+0.5 mmol/L, = 0.014) were greater after HE-BF compared to LE-BF. In the HE-BF condition, compared to LE-BF, there was a greater incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for plasma glucose post-breakfast (+44 ± 59%, = 0.007), but lower iAUC post-lunch (&minus;55 ± 36%, < 0.001). Total insulin AUC was greater (+480 mIU/mL/h, < 0.01) after HE-BF compared to LE-BF. Twenty-four-hour (24 h) CGM revealed no differences in mean glucose and total AUC between conditions. Compared to a low-energy first meal, a high-energy first meal elicited exaggerated plasma insulin and glucose responses until lunch but had little effect on 24 h glycaemia. During periods of prolonged sitting, adults with prediabetes may have more beneficial postprandial insulin responses to a low-energy first meal.

Citing Articles

Non-Invasive Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients Without Diabetes: Use in Cardiovascular Prevention-A Systematic Review.

Wilczek F, van der Stouwe J, Petrasch G, Niederseer D Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(1.

PMID: 39796978 PMC: 11722592. DOI: 10.3390/s25010187.


Restricting sugar or carbohydrate intake does not impact physical activity level or energy intake over 24 h despite changes in substrate use: a randomised crossover study in healthy men and women.

Hengist A, Davies R, Rogers P, Brunstrom J, van Loon L, Walhin J Eur J Nutr. 2022; 62(2):921-940.

PMID: 36326863 PMC: 9941259. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-022-03048-x.


Nutritional Strategies in Prediabetes: A Scoping Review of Recent Evidence.

Yau J, Thor S, Ramadas A Nutrients. 2020; 12(10).

PMID: 33003593 PMC: 7650618. DOI: 10.3390/nu12102990.

References
1.
Costa B, Vizcaino J, Pinol J, Cabre J, Fuentes C . Relevance of casual undetected hyperglycemia among high-risk individuals for developing diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007; 78(2):289-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.03.007. View

2.
Matthews C, Chen K, Freedson P, Buchowski M, Beech B, Pate R . Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 167(7):875-81. PMC: 3527832. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm390. View

3.
Hatori M, Vollmers C, Zarrinpar A, DiTacchio L, Bushong E, Gill S . Time-restricted feeding without reducing caloric intake prevents metabolic diseases in mice fed a high-fat diet. Cell Metab. 2012; 15(6):848-60. PMC: 3491655. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.04.019. View

4.
Dempsey P, Blankenship J, Larsen R, Sacre J, Sethi P, Straznicky N . Interrupting prolonged sitting in type 2 diabetes: nocturnal persistence of improved glycaemic control. Diabetologia. 2016; 60(3):499-507. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-016-4169-z. View

5.
Elliott R, Morgan L, Tredger J, Deacon S, Wright J, Marks V . Glucagon-like peptide-1 (7-36)amide and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide secretion in response to nutrient ingestion in man: acute post-prandial and 24-h secretion patterns. J Endocrinol. 1993; 138(1):159-66. DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1380159. View