» Articles » PMID: 29879163

Improvement of Quality of 3D Printed Objects by Elimination of Microscopic Structural Defects in Fused Deposition Modeling

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Jun 8
PMID 29879163
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Additive manufacturing with fused deposition modeling (FDM) is currently optimized for a wide range of research and commercial applications. The major disadvantage of FDM-created products is their low quality and structural defects (porosity), which impose an obstacle to utilizing them in functional prototyping and direct digital manufacturing of objects intended to contact with gases and liquids. This article describes a simple and efficient approach for assessing the quality of 3D printed objects. Using this approach it was shown that the wall permeability of a printed object depends on its geometric shape and is gradually reduced in a following series: cylinder > cube > pyramid > sphere > cone. Filament feed rate, wall geometry and G-code-defined wall structure were found as primary parameters that influence the quality of 3D-printed products. Optimization of these parameters led to an overall increase in quality and improvement of sealing properties. It was demonstrated that high quality of 3D printed objects can be achieved using routinely available printers and standard filaments.

Citing Articles

Detecting Multi-Scale Defects in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing of Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites: A Review of Challenges and Advanced Non-Destructive Testing Techniques.

Ashebir D, Hendlmeier A, Dunn M, Arablouei R, Lomov S, Di Pietro A Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(21).

PMID: 39518196 PMC: 11548215. DOI: 10.3390/polym16212986.


A Sensor Probe with Active and Passive Humidity Management for In Situ Soil CO Monitoring.

Anderson J, Huber D, Walsh O Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(18).

PMID: 39338776 PMC: 11435515. DOI: 10.3390/s24186034.


Nozzle Innovations That Improve Capacity and Capabilities of Multimaterial Additive Manufacturing.

McCauley P, Bayles A ACS Eng Au. 2024; 4(4):368-380.

PMID: 39185389 PMC: 11342301. DOI: 10.1021/acsengineeringau.4c00001.


Development of stochastically reconstructed 3D porous media micromodels using additive manufacturing: numerical and experimental validation.

Lee D, Ruf M, Karadimitriou N, Steeb H, Manousidaki M, Varouchakis E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):9375.

PMID: 38654100 PMC: 11039688. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60075-w.


Use of 3D printed connectors to redesign full face snorkeling masks in the COVID-19 era: A preliminary technical case-study.

Profili J, Brunet R, Dubois E, Groenhuis V, Hof L Ann 3D Print Med. 2024; 3:100023.

PMID: 38620734 PMC: 8234254. DOI: 10.1016/j.stlm.2021.100023.


References
1.
Chan H, Tan M, Wu H . Point-of-care testing: applications of 3D printing. Lab Chip. 2017; 17(16):2713-2739. DOI: 10.1039/c7lc00397h. View

2.
Kinstlinger I, Miller J . 3D-printed fluidic networks as vasculature for engineered tissue. Lab Chip. 2016; 16(11):2025-43. DOI: 10.1039/c6lc00193a. View

3.
Macdonald N, Currivan S, Tedone L, Paull B . Direct Production of Microstructured Surfaces for Planar Chromatography Using 3D Printing. Anal Chem. 2017; 89(4):2457-2463. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04546. View

4.
Truby R, Lewis J . Printing soft matter in three dimensions. Nature. 2016; 540(7633):371-378. DOI: 10.1038/nature21003. View

5.
Waheed S, Cabot J, Macdonald N, Lewis T, Guijt R, Paull B . 3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers. Lab Chip. 2016; 16(11):1993-2013. DOI: 10.1039/c6lc00284f. View