» Articles » PMID: 29875890

Clinical, Immunological and Virological Responses of Zidovudine-Lamivudine-Nevirapine Zidovudine-Lamivudine-Efavirenz Antiretroviral Treatment (ART) Among HIV-1 Infected Children: Asella Teaching and Referral Hospital, South-East Ethiopia

Overview
Publisher Bentham Open
Date 2018 Jun 8
PMID 29875890
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Antiretroviral Therapy(ART) remarkably reduced HIV-1 infection-related mortality in children. The efficacy and safety of different ART regimen in pediatric age groups remained issues of debates and available evidence were scarce especially among children taking the of one the two prototypes (NVP or EFV) Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor(NNRTI) as backbone of ART regimen.Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare clinical, immunological and virological responses of zidovudine-lamivudine-nevirapine (AZT+3TC+ NVP) zidovudine-lamivudine-efavirenz (AZT+3TC+EFV) ART regimen among HIV-1 infected children.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was done by reviewing medical records of the patients to evaluate clinical, immunological and virological outcomes of NVP+AZT+3TC EFV+AZT+3TC ART regimen among HIV-1 infected children. Data were entered into Epi-info version 7.2.2 for clean up and exported to SPSS version 17 for analysis. Paired and Independent t-tests were used to compare the CD4 cell count, weight and virologic level at six months with corresponding baseline value; and the mean weight, CD4 gain and viral suppression across the two ART regimens at six months of ART respectively.

Results: Medical records of 122 patients from NVP-based regimen and 61 patients from EFV group were reviewed. After six months of NVP+AZT+3TC treatment, the mean CD4 cell count difference from baseline was 215(95% CI, 175.414-245.613, p<0.001). From EFV+AZT+3TC group, the mean CD4 cell count difference from baseline was 205(95% CI 155.404-235.623, p< 0.001). The mean CD4 count difference between the two regimens was comparable (p 0.145). Similarly, optimal viral suppression was achieved in 82% (100/122) of NVP+AZT+3TC regimen and 83% (44/61) of EFV+AZT+3TC regimen which was still comparable across the two groups.

Conclusion: There was no difference in clinical, immunological and virological outcomes among patients taking NVP+AZT+3TC or EFV+AZT+3TC ART regimen.

Citing Articles

Virological Suppression and its Predictors Among HIV/AIDS Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy in Ethiopia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Melak D, Bayou F, Yasin H, Zerga A, Wagaye B, Yeshanew Ayele F Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024; 11(4):ofae168.

PMID: 38654969 PMC: 11036161. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae168.


First line antiretroviral treatment failure and its association with drug substitution and sex among children in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Masresha S, Alen G, Kidie A, Dessie A, Dejene T Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):18294.

PMID: 36316358 PMC: 9622840. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22237-6.


Treatment outcomes and characteristics of HIV-2 patients compared to HIV-1 patients on an NNRTI-based first line art at the adult infectious diseases centre of the University Teaching Hospital (UTH) in Lusaka.

Bhebhe A, Chongwe G, Moonga G Pan Afr Med J. 2022; 40:231.

PMID: 35178142 PMC: 8817188. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2021.40.231.25149.


Predictors of Current CD4+ T-Cell Count Among Women of Reproductive Age on Antiretroviral Therapy in Public Hospitals, Southwest Ethiopia.

Belay A, Manaye G, Kebede K, Abateneh D HIV AIDS (Auckl). 2021; 13:667-679.

PMID: 34168505 PMC: 8216731. DOI: 10.2147/HIV.S294367.


Long-Term Immunological and Virological Outcomes in Children Receiving Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy at Hawassa University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Southern Ethiopia.

Fenta D, Wube T, Mohammed Nuru M J Immunol Res. 2021; 2021:2498025.

PMID: 33928167 PMC: 8053046. DOI: 10.1155/2021/2498025.

References
1.
Swaminathan S, Padmapriyadarsini C, Venkatesan P, Narendran G, Kumar S, Iliayas S . Efficacy and safety of once-daily nevirapine- or efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy in HIV-associated tuberculosis: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 53(7):716-24. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cir447. View

2.
Ayele T, Worku A, Kebede Y, Alemu K, Kasim A, Shkedy Z . Choice of initial antiretroviral drugs and treatment outcomes among HIV-infected patients in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Syst Rev. 2017; 6(1):173. PMC: 5574138. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0567-7. View

3.
Puthanakit T, Kerr S, Ananworanich J, Bunupuradah T, Boonrak P, Sirisanthana V . Pattern and predictors of immunologic recovery in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children receiving non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009; 28(6):488-92. DOI: 10.1097/inf.0b013e318194eea6. View

4.
Gulick R, Ribaudo H, Shikuma C, Lustgarten S, Squires K, Meyer 3rd W . Triple-nucleoside regimens versus efavirenz-containing regimens for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(18):1850-61. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa031772. View

5.
Jiang H, Zhang M, Chen H, Yang Y, Deng M, Ruan B . Nevirapine versus efavirenz for patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2014; 25:130-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.04.020. View