» Articles » PMID: 29875154

A Tale of Two Cities: Exploring the Retail Impact of Flavoured Tobacco Restrictions in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota

Overview
Journal Tob Control
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2018 Jun 8
PMID 29875154
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Flavoured tobacco is increasingly popular with youth. The twin cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota restricted the sale of flavoured tobacco to adult-only tobacco shops in an effort to reduce youth access and exposure to these products. This observational study explores the impact of these policies on the retail environment.

Methods: Between November 2015 and April 2017, observational assessments were conducted at convenience and grocery stores preimplementation and postimplementation of flavoured tobacco restrictions in Minneapolis (n=41), Saint Paul (n=37) and the comparison city of Brooklyn Park, Minnesota (n=14).

Results: After policy implementation, significantly fewer of the convenience and grocery stores sold flavoured tobacco in Minneapolis (85.4% vs 39.0%, p<0.001, n=41) and Saint Paul (97.3% vs 8.1%, p<0.001, n=37). The average proportion of tobacco inventory that was unflavoured increased significantly in Minneapolis (42.9%±2.7% vs 56.7%±3.1%, p=0.002) and Saint Paul (40.8%±2.5% vs 70.3%±1.9%, p<0.001). Flavoured tobacco was available at significantly fewer convenience and grocery stores in Minneapolis (39.0%, p<0.001) and Saint Paul (8.1%, p<0.001) than in the comparison city of Brooklyn Park (100%, n=14). Most retailers complied with these policies by removing flavoured tobacco from their shelves.

Conclusions: Policies that restrict the sale of flavoured tobacco to adult-only tobacco shops are associated with decreased availability of flavoured tobacco in convenience and grocery stores and increased proportion of tobacco inventory that is unflavoured.

Citing Articles

Cross-State Border Nicotine Vaping Products Purchase-Early Evidence From State Emergency Sales Restrictions in 2019.

Cheng K, Liber A, Levy D Nicotine Tob Res. 2024; 26(8):1007-1013.

PMID: 38297975 PMC: 11519049. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntae017.


A Longitudinal Analysis of Flavored Cigar Use and Cigar Smoking Cessation Among US Adults.

Buszkiewicz J, Cook S, Oh H, Mukerjee R, Hirschtick J, Fleischer N Nicotine Tob Res. 2023; 26(7):816-825.

PMID: 38141259 PMC: 11190056. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntad256.


The actual and anticipated effects of restrictions on flavoured electronic nicotine delivery systems: a scoping review.

Cadham C, Liber A, Sanchez-Romero L, Issabakhsh M, Warner K, Meza R BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):2128.

PMID: 36402989 PMC: 9675183. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14440-x.


Flavored Tobacco Sales Restrictions Reduce Tobacco Product Availability and Retailer Advertising.

Holmes L, Lempert L, Ling P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(6).

PMID: 35329145 PMC: 8953832. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063455.


Youth Tobacco Use Before and After Local Sales Restrictions on Flavored and Menthol Tobacco Products in Minnesota.

Olson L, Coats E, Rogers T, Brown E, Nonnemaker J, Ross A J Adolesc Health. 2022; 70(6):978-984.

PMID: 35272928 PMC: 9133141. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.01.129.