» Articles » PMID: 29871534

Use of a Distraction-to-stall Lengthening Procedure in Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods: A Single-center Cohort Study

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2018 Jun 7
PMID 29871534
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to assess the outcome of patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) using a standardized distraction procedure with intended distraction-to-stall and to compare the outcomes between idiopathic and nonidiopathic patients.

Methods: This was a retrospective single-center cohort study. Conversion cases were excluded. Distractions were performed with 2- to 3-month intervals with the intention of distraction-to-stall on both rods. Distraction length was measured on X-rays every 6 months. Spinal height was assessed using T1-T12 and T1-S1 annual increase.

Results: 19 patients (eight idiopathic and 11 nonidiopathic) were included. Mean age at surgery was 9.7 ± 1.9 years, and median follow-up was 1.9 years (interquartile range (IQR): 1.3-2.2). Major curve improved from median 76° (IQR: 64-83) preoperatively to 42° (IQR: 32-51) postoperatively ( p < 0.001) corresponding to a curve correction of 43% (IQR: 33-51). Correction was maintained at 1- and 2-year follow-up. Median annual T1-T12 and T1-S1 height increase were 10 mm (IQR: 6-16) and 11 mm (IQR: 7-33), respectively. A total of 159 distraction procedures were performed; 83.5% of these were distracted-to-stall, and 16.5% were stopped due to discomfort. Median rod distraction per procedure was 2.0 mm (IQR: 1.6-2.7) for the concave side and 1.7 mm (IQR: 1.4-2.5) for the convex side. Five patients had implant-related complications. Patients with nonidiopathic etiology were significantly younger and had lower flexibility compared with idiopathic patients ( p ≤ 0.040). However, we found no statistically significant difference in curve correction, spinal height increase, distraction length, or complications between the two groups ( p ≥ 0.109).

Conclusion: MCGR effectively corrected the deformity and increased spinal height using a distraction procedure with intended distraction-to-stall. Five of 19 patients had implant-related complications, and we found no difference in the outcomes between idiopathic and nonidiopathic patients.

Citing Articles

Complications and Health-Related Quality of Life in Children with Various Etiologies of Early-Onset Scoliosis Treated with Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods-A Multicenter Study.

Glowka P, Grabala P, Gupta M, Pereira D, Latalski M, Danielewicz A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(14).

PMID: 39064107 PMC: 11277853. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144068.


Radiological Outcomes of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods for the Treatment of Children with Various Etiologies of Early-Onset Scoliosis-A Multicenter Study.

Grabala P, Gupta M, Pereira D, Latalski M, Danielewicz A, Glowka P J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38541757 PMC: 10970737. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061529.


Magnetically controlled growing rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: analysis of 52 consecutive cases demonstrates improvement of coronal deformity.

Ellinger F, Tropp H, Gerdhem P, Bjornsson Hallgren H, Ivars K J Spine Surg. 2023; 9(3):259-268.

PMID: 37841788 PMC: 10570638. DOI: 10.21037/jss-22-70.


Less-Invasive Approach to Early-Onset Scoliosis-Surgical Technique for Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod (MCGR) Based on Treatment of 2-Year-Old Child with Severe Scoliosis.

Grabala P, Helenius I, Chamberlin K, Galgano M Children (Basel). 2023; 10(3).

PMID: 36980113 PMC: 10047795. DOI: 10.3390/children10030555.


Longitudinal comparison of direct medical cost, radiological and health-related quality of life treatment outcomes between traditional growing rods and magnetically controlled growing rods from preoperative to maturity.

Cheung P, Wong C, Sadiang-Abay J, Lau S, Cheung J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):791.

PMID: 35982444 PMC: 9386950. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05750-7.