» Articles » PMID: 29870856

Clearance of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) Carriage: a Comparative Study of NDM-1 and KPC CPE

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2018 Jun 6
PMID 29870856
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare clearance rates and related characteristics of patients carrying KPC-producing carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) with those of patients carrying NDM-1-producing CPE.

Methods: From November 2010 to October 2016, consecutive patients whose clinical or surveillance cultures yielded CPE were prospectively identified and followed in a 2700-bed tertiary referral hospital. CPE control protocols included strict single-room isolation, contact precautions and weekly surveillance cultures. CPE clearance was defined as three or more consecutive CPE-negative cultures without relapse. We compared patients carrying NDM-1 CPE and KPC and those with and without clearance. The time to CPE clearance or discharge was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and NDM-1 CPE and KPC CPE groups were compared.

Results: A total of 147 patients carrying CPE, 106 with NDM-1 and 41 with KPC, were included in the study. At the time of hospital discharge, 12 of the 106 patients carrying NDM-1 CPE were clear of CPE, whereas none of the KPC CPE patients were (NDM-1, 11.3% (12/106) versus KPC, 0% (0/41), p 0.02). There was no significant association between CPE clearance and factors such as an immunocompromised condition, antibiotic usage, or species of colonizing organism. Among 40 patients who were readmitted, CPE non-clearance was significantly higher in patients carrying KPC CPE (NDM-1, 36.7% (11/30) versus KPC, 80.0% (8/10), p 0.03).

Conclusions: Compared with NDM-1 CPE patients, patients carrying KPC CPE had a significantly lower probability of clearance during hospitalization. Furthermore, KPC CPE carriage persisted for a substantial period of time following patient discharge.

Citing Articles

Understanding patient and healthcare worker experiences and perspectives of multidrug-resistant organisms.

Watson E, Tsindos T, Peleg A, Bass P, Stewardson A, Ayton D JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023; 5(3):dlad071.

PMID: 37362585 PMC: 10285115. DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad071.


Carriage of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: duration and risk factors.

Herrera S, Torralbo B, Herranz S, Bernal-Maurandi J, Rubio E, Pitart C Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023; 42(5):631-638.

PMID: 36964885 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-023-04581-1.


Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Fermenting and Non-Fermenting Rods Isolated from Hospital Patients in Poland-What Are They Susceptible to?.

Brauncajs M, Bielec F, Macieja A, Pastuszak-Lewandoska D Biomedicines. 2022; 10(12).

PMID: 36551805 PMC: 9775024. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123049.


Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Positive Xpert Carba-R Tests for Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales According to Culture Positivity.

Seo H, Lee J, Ryu S, Kwak S, Kim E, Bae S Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022; 9(1):ofab594.

PMID: 35036462 PMC: 8754382. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab594.


Coupling Machine Learning and High Throughput Multiplex Digital PCR Enables Accurate Detection of Carbapenem-Resistant Genes in Clinical Isolates.

Miglietta L, Moniri A, Pennisi I, Malpartida-Cardenas K, Abbas H, Hill-Cawthorne K Front Mol Biosci. 2021; 8:775299.

PMID: 34888355 PMC: 8650054. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.775299.