» Articles » PMID: 29867496

Structural Changes Due to Antagonist Binding in Ligand Binding Pocket of Androgen Receptor Elucidated Through Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Overview
Journal Front Pharmacol
Date 2018 Jun 6
PMID 29867496
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When a small molecule binds to the androgen receptor (AR), a conformational change can occur which impacts subsequent binding of co-regulator proteins and DNA. In order to accurately study this mechanism, the scientific community needs a crystal structure of the Wild type AR (WT-AR) ligand binding domain, bound with antagonist. To address this open need, we leveraged molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to construct a structure of the WT-AR ligand binding domain bound with antagonist bicalutamide. The structure of mutant AR (Mut-AR) bound with this same antagonist informed this study. After molecular docking analysis pinpointed the suitable binding orientation of a ligand in AR, the model was further optimized through 1 μs of MD simulations. Using this approach, three molecular systems were studied: (1) WT-AR bound with agonist R1881, (2) WT-AR bound with antagonist bicalutamide, and (3) Mut-AR bound with bicalutamide. Our structures were very similar to the experimentally determined structures of both WT-AR with R1881 and Mut-AR with bicalutamide, demonstrating the trustworthiness of this approach. In our model, when WT-AR is bound with bicalutamide, Val716/Lys720/Gln733, or Met734/Gln738/Glu897 move and thus disturb the positive and negative charge clumps of the AF2 site. This disruption of the AF2 site is key for understanding the impact of antagonist binding on subsequent co-regulator binding. In conclusion, the antagonist induced structural changes in WT-AR detailed in this study will enable further AR research and will facilitate AR targeting drug discovery.

Citing Articles

Study of Glabranin as an Inhibitor Against Prostate Cancer: Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, MM-PBSA Calculation and QSAR Prediction.

Browne R, Goswami N, Borah P, Roy J Indian J Clin Biochem. 2024; 39(3):331-343.

PMID: 39641116 PMC: 11615236. DOI: 10.1007/s12291-023-01134-3.


Molecular Targets of Minor Cannabinoids in Breast Cancer: In Silico and In Vitro Studies.

Almeida C, Palmeira A, Valente M, Correia-da-Silva G, Vinggaard A, Sousa M Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(9).

PMID: 39338407 PMC: 11434916. DOI: 10.3390/ph17091245.


Systematic computational strategies for identifying protein targets and lead discovery.

Kataria A, Srivastava A, Singh D, Haque S, Han I, Yadav D RSC Med Chem. 2024; 15(7):2254-2269.

PMID: 39026640 PMC: 11253860. DOI: 10.1039/d4md00223g.


Decoding the κ Opioid Receptor (KOR): Advancements in Structural Understanding and Implications for Opioid Analgesic Development.

Li Z, Huang R, Xia M, Chang N, Guo W, Liu J Molecules. 2024; 29(11).

PMID: 38893511 PMC: 11173883. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29112635.


Luteolin inhibits A549 cells proliferation and migration by down-regulating androgen receptors.

Li X, Tang Y, Liang P, Sun M, Li T, Shen Z Eur J Med Res. 2023; 28(1):353.

PMID: 37716981 PMC: 10504720. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01302-4.


References
1.
Chou K, Mao B . Collective motion in DNA and its role in drug intercalation. Biopolymers. 1988; 27(11):1795-815. DOI: 10.1002/bip.360271109. View

2.
Khelashvili G, Grossfield A, Feller S, Pitman M, Weinstein H . Structural and dynamic effects of cholesterol at preferred sites of interaction with rhodopsin identified from microsecond length molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins. 2009; 76(2):403-17. PMC: 4101808. DOI: 10.1002/prot.22355. View

3.
Sakkiah S, Arooj M, Cao G, Lee K . Insight the C-site pocket conformational changes responsible for sirtuin 2 activity using molecular dynamics simulations. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e59278. PMC: 3603925. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059278. View

4.
Baker N, Sept D, Joseph S, Holst M, McCammon J . Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(18):10037-41. PMC: 56910. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.181342398. View

5.
Ng H, Shu M, Luo H, Ye H, Ge W, Perkins R . Estrogenic activity data extraction and in silico prediction show the endocrine disruption potential of bisphenol A replacement compounds. Chem Res Toxicol. 2015; 28(9):1784-95. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00243. View