» Articles » PMID: 29861867

Exploring the Roles of Urinary HAI-1, EpCAM & EGFR in Bladder Cancer Prognosis & Risk Stratification

Overview
Journal Oncotarget
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Jun 5
PMID 29861867
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether elevated urinary HAI-1, EpCAM and EGFR are independent prognostic biomarkers within non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients, and have utility for risk stratification to facilitate treatment decisions.

Results: After accounting for EAU risk group in NMIBC patients, the risk of BC-specific death was 2.14 times higher (95% CI: 1.08 to 4.24) if HAI-1 was elevated and 2.04 times higher (95% CI: 1.02 to 4.07) if EpCAM was elevated. The majority of events occurred in the high-risk NMIBC group and this is where the biggest difference is seen in the survival curves when plotted for EAU risk groups separately. In MIBC patients, being elevated for any of the three biomarkers was significantly associated with BC-specific mortality after accounting for other risk factors, HR = 4.30 (95% CI: 1.85 to 10.03).

Patients And Methods: Urinary levels of HAI-1, EpCAM and EGFR were measured by ELISA in 683 and 175 patients with newly-diagnosed NMIBC and MIBC, respectively, recruited to the Bladder Cancer Prognosis Programme. Associations between biomarkers and progression, BC-specific mortality and all-cause mortality were evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regression models, adjusted for European Association of Urology (EAU) NMIBC risk groups. The upper 25% of values for each biomarker within NMIBC patients were considered as elevated. Exploratory analyses in urine from MIBC patients were also undertaken.

Conclusion: Urinary HAI-1 and EpCAM are prognostic biomarkers for NMIBC patients. These biomarkers have potential to guide treatment decisions for high-risk NMIBC patients. Further analyses are required to define the roles of HAI-1, EpCAM and EGFR in MIBC patients.

Citing Articles

Research Progress of Urine Biomarkers in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Bladder Cancer.

Jin F, Shahid M, Kim J Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021; 1306:61-80.

PMID: 33959906 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-63908-2_5.


PD-L2 Is Constitutively Expressed in Normal and Malignant Urothelium.

Dowell A, Munford H, Goel A, Gordon N, James N, Cheng K Front Oncol. 2021; 11:626748.

PMID: 33718196 PMC: 7951139. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.626748.


Proteomic profiling of bladder cancer for precision medicine in the clinical setting: A review for the busy urologist.

Kim J, Jin P, Yang W, Kim W Investig Clin Urol. 2020; 61(6):539-554.

PMID: 33135400 PMC: 7606121. DOI: 10.4111/icu.20200317.


Urinary Markers in Bladder Cancer: An Update.

Santoni G, Morelli M, Amantini C, Battelli N Front Oncol. 2018; 8:362.

PMID: 30245975 PMC: 6137202. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00362.

References
1.
Bryan R, Shimwell N, Wei W, Devall A, Pirrie S, James N . Urinary EpCAM in urothelial bladder cancer patients: characterisation and evaluation of biomarker potential. Br J Cancer. 2013; 110(3):679-85. PMC: 3915119. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.744. View

2.
Noon A, Albertsen P, Thomas F, Rosario D, Catto J . Competing mortality in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer: evidence of undertreatment in the elderly and female patients. Br J Cancer. 2013; 108(7):1534-40. PMC: 3629420. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.106. View

3.
Shimwell N, Bryan R, Wei W, James N, Cheng K, Zeegers M . Combined proteome and transcriptome analyses for the discovery of urinary biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2013; 108(9):1854-61. PMC: 3658509. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.157. View

4.
Czerniak B, Dinney C, McConkey D . Origins of Bladder Cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2016; 11:149-74. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-012513-104703. View

5.
Kamat A, Vlahou A, Taylor J, Hudson M, Pesch B, Ingersoll M . Considerations on the use of urine markers in the management of patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2014; 32(7):1069-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.06.017. View