» Articles » PMID: 29854368

Design and Control of a New Biomimetic Transfemoral Knee Prosthesis Using an Echo-Control Scheme

Overview
Journal J Healthc Eng
Date 2018 Jun 2
PMID 29854368
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Passive knee prostheses require a significant amount of additional metabolic energy to carry out a gait cycle, therefore affecting the natural human walk performance. Current active knee prostheses are still limited because they do not reply with accuracy of the natural human knee movement, and the time response is relatively large. This paper presents the design and control of a new biomimetic-controlled transfemoral knee prosthesis based on a polycentric-type mechanism. The aim was to develop a knee prosthesis able to provide additional power and to mimic with accuracy of the natural human knee movement using a stable control strategy. The design of the knee mechanism was obtained from the body-guidance kinematics synthesis based on real human walking patterns obtained from computer vision and 3D reconstruction. A biomechanical evaluation of the synthesized prosthesis was then carried out. For the activation and control of the prosthesis, an echo-control strategy was proposed and developed. In this echo-control strategy, the sound side leg is sensed and synchronized with the activation of the knee prosthesis. An experimental prototype was built and evaluated in a test rig. The results revealed that the prosthetic knee is able to mimic the biomechanics of the human knee.

Citing Articles

Piloting a Novel Computational Framework for Identifying Prosthesis-Specific Contributions to Gait Deviations.

NGuessan J, Ahmed M, Leineweber M, Goyal S Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2024; 40(12):e3876.

PMID: 39389926 PMC: 11618235. DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3876.


Development and Performance Verification of a Motorized Prosthetic Leg for Stair Walking.

Park K, Ahn H, Lee K, Lee C Appl Bionics Biomech. 2020; 2020:8872362.

PMID: 33178333 PMC: 7609156. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8872362.


Relying on more sense for enhancing lower limb prostheses control: a review.

Tschiedel M, Russold M, Kaniusas E J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020; 17(1):99.

PMID: 32680530 PMC: 7368691. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-00726-x.

References
1.
Johansson J, Sherrill D, Riley P, Bonato P, Herr H . A clinical comparison of variable-damping and mechanically passive prosthetic knee devices. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 84(8):563-75. DOI: 10.1097/01.phm.0000174665.74933.0b. View

2.
Siu D, Rudan J, Wevers H, Griffiths P . Femoral articular shape and geometry. A three-dimensional computerized analysis of the knee. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11(2):166-73. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80012-9. View

3.
Pan Y, Zheng R, Liu F, Jing W, Yong C, Liang X . The use of CT scan and stereo lithography apparatus technologies in a canine individualized rib prosthesis. Int J Surg. 2013; 12(5):71-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.10.006. View

4.
Kaufman K, Levine J, Brey R, Iverson B, McCrady S, Padgett D . Gait and balance of transfemoral amputees using passive mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees. Gait Posture. 2007; 26(4):489-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.011. View

5.
Radcliffe C . The Knud Jansen Lecture: above-knee prosthetics. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1977; 1(3):146-60. DOI: 10.3109/03093647709164629. View