» Articles » PMID: 29846827

International Consensus on a Complications List After Gastrectomy for Cancer

Abstract

Background: Perioperative complications can affect outcomes after gastrectomy for cancer, with high mortality and morbidity rates ranging between 10 and 40%. The absence of a standardized system for recording complications generates wide variation in evaluating their impacts on outcomes and hinders proposals of quality-improvement projects. The aim of this study was to provide a list of defined gastrectomy complications approved through international consensus.

Methods: The Gastrectomy Complications Consensus Group consists of 34 European gastric cancer experts who are members of the International Gastric Cancer Association. A group meeting established the work plan for study implementation through Delphi surveys. A consensus was reached regarding a set of standardized methods to define gastrectomy complications.

Results: A standardized list of 27 defined complications (grouped into 3 intraoperative, 14 postoperative general, and 10 postoperative surgical complications) was created to provide a simple but accurate template for recording individual gastrectomy complications. A consensus was reached for both the list of complications that should be considered major adverse events after gastrectomy for cancer and their specific definitions. The study group also agreed that an assessment of each surgical case should be completed at patient discharge and 90 days postoperatively using a Complication Recording Sheet.

Conclusion: The list of defined complications (soon to be validated in an international multicenter study) and the ongoing development of an electronic datasheet app to record them provide the basic infrastructure to reach the ultimate goals of standardized international data collection, establishment of benchmark results, and fostering of quality-improvement projects.

Citing Articles

Association Between Reconstruction Technique and Clinical Outcomes in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Proximal Gastrectomy.

Sedlak K, Rawicz-Pruszynski K, Pelc Z, Mlak R, Geca K, Skorzewska M Cancers (Basel). 2025; 16(24.

PMID: 39766179 PMC: 11674166. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16244282.


The effect of supplementary parenteral nutrition with different energy intakes on clinical outcomes of patients after gastric cancer surgery.

Sun S, Sun W, Xie W, Zhao F, Guo X, Zhou J BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):424.

PMID: 39731118 PMC: 11674070. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02734-3.


Prophylactic Drain Placement and Postoperative Invasive Procedures After Gastrectomy: The Abdominal Drain After Gastrectomy (ADIGE) Randomized Clinical Trial.

Weindelmayer J, Mengardo V, Ascari F, Baiocchi G, Casadei R, De Palma G JAMA Surg. 2024; 160(2):135-143.

PMID: 39602143 PMC: 11822533. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5227.


Effect of prehabilitation for patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery: a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xu L, Zheng X, Yan Y, Wang B, Wang A BMJ Open. 2024; 14(9):e083914.

PMID: 39260840 PMC: 11409279. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083914.


Omentum preservation versus complete omentectomy in gastrectomy for gastric cancer (OMEGA trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Keywani K, Eshuis W, Borgstein A, van Det M, van Duijvendijk P, van Etten B Trials. 2024; 25(1):588.

PMID: 39232781 PMC: 11375919. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08396-z.


References
1.
BRUCE J, Russell E, Mollison J, Krukowski Z . The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Technol Assess. 2001; 5(22):1-194. DOI: 10.3310/hta5220. View

2.
Sano T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, Nashimoto A, Kurita A, Hiratsuka M . Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy--Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 9501. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(14):2767-73. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.184. View

3.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P . Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(2):205-13. PMC: 1360123. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. View

4.
Clavien P, Sanabria J, Strasberg S . Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992; 111(5):518-26. View

5.
Cunningham D, Allum W, Stenning S, Thompson J, van de Velde C, Nicolson M . Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(1):11-20. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa055531. View