» Articles » PMID: 29846557

Clostridium Difficile: Investigating Transmission Patterns Between Infected and Colonized Patients Using Whole Genome Sequencing

Abstract

Background: Whole genome sequencing (WGS) studies can enhance our understanding of the role of patients with asymptomatic Clostridium difficile colonization in transmission.

Methods: Isolates obtained from patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and colonization identified in a study conducted during 2006-2007 at 6 Canadian hospitals underwent typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence typing, and WGS. Isolates from incident CDI cases not in the initial study were also sequenced where possible. Ward movement and typing data were combined to identify plausible donors for each CDI case, as defined by shared time and space within predefined limits. Proportions of plausible donors for CDI cases that were colonized, infected, or both were examined.

Results: Five hundred fifty-four isolates were sequenced successfully, 353 from colonized patients and 201 from CDI cases. The NAP1/027/ST1 strain was the most common strain, found in 124 (62%) of infected and 92 (26%) of colonized patients. A donor with a plausible ward link was found for 81 CDI cases (40%) using WGS with a threshold of ≤2 single nucleotide polymorphisms to determine relatedness. Sixty-five (32%) CDI cases could be linked to both infected and colonized donors. Exclusive linkages to infected and colonized donors were found for 28 (14%) and 12 (6%) CDI cases, respectively.

Conclusions: Colonized patients contribute to transmission, but CDI cases are more likely linked to other infected patients than colonized patients in this cohort with high rates of the NAP1/027/ST1 strain, highlighting the importance of local prevalence of virulent strains in determining transmission dynamics.

Citing Articles

Genomic Characterization of Strains: Potential Probiotics from Ethiopian Traditional Fermented Cottage Cheese.

Gizachew S, Engidawork E Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(11).

PMID: 39596588 PMC: 11593849. DOI: 10.3390/genes15111389.


Comparison of rectal swabs and fecal samples for the detection of infections with a new in-house PCR assay.

Huletsky A, Loo V, Longtin Y, Longtin J, Trottier S, Tremblay C Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 12(6):e0022524.

PMID: 38687067 PMC: 11237655. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00225-24.


Fungal and bacterial gut microbiota differ between colonization and infection.

Henderickx J, Crobach M, Terveer E, Smits W, Kuijper E, Zwittink R Microbiome Res Rep. 2024; 3(1):8.

PMID: 38455084 PMC: 10917615. DOI: 10.20517/mrr.2023.52.


Genomic surveillance of transmission and virulence in a healthcare setting.

Newcomer E, Fishbein S, Zhang K, Hink T, Reske K, Cass C mBio. 2024; 15(3):e0330023.

PMID: 38329369 PMC: 10936198. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03300-23.


Comparative Genomics of Clostridioides difficile.

Janezic S, Garneau J, Monot M Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024; 1435:199-218.

PMID: 38175477 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-42108-2_10.


References
1.
Evans C, Safdar N . Current Trends in the Epidemiology and Outcomes of Clostridium difficile Infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2015; 60 Suppl 2:S66-71. DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ140. View

2.
Walker A, Eyre D, Wyllie D, Dingle K, Harding R, OConnor L . Characterisation of Clostridium difficile hospital ward-based transmission using extensive epidemiological data and molecular typing. PLoS Med. 2012; 9(2):e1001172. PMC: 3274560. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001172. View

3.
Sebaihia M, Wren B, Mullany P, Fairweather N, Minton N, Stabler R . The multidrug-resistant human pathogen Clostridium difficile has a highly mobile, mosaic genome. Nat Genet. 2006; 38(7):779-86. DOI: 10.1038/ng1830. View

4.
Didelot X, Eyre D, Cule M, Ip C, Ansari M, Griffiths D . Microevolutionary analysis of Clostridium difficile genomes to investigate transmission. Genome Biol. 2012; 13(12):R118. PMC: 4056369. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-12-r118. View

5.
Donskey C, Kundrapu S, Deshpande A . Colonization versus carriage of Clostridium difficile. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015; 29(1):13-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2014.11.001. View