» Articles » PMID: 29846434

Low Prevalence of Relevant Findings in Inappropriate Echocardiograms and Discordant Perceptions Between Cardiologists and Patients

Overview
Date 2018 May 31
PMID 29846434
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Complementary examinations are "inadequate" whenever the likelihood of benefits from their indication is lower than the negative results. The low benefit is a result of poor performance in detecting relevant changes that lead to improved behavior. However, inadequate examinations are prevalent and little is known about patients' notions of the usefulness of such indications. The aim of this study was to describe relevant findings in inappropriate echocardiograms and to assess the level of agreement between patients and cardiologists regarding their usefulness. Adults without known cardiovascular disease who were referred for echocardiogram by inappropriate criteria according to the American College of Cardiology were selected. Relevant findings were defined by any change in the degree of moderate to severe, according to the American Society of Echocardiography. We tested the level of agreement between the patients who underwent echocardiographic examination and the physicians who requested the exam through a standard questionnaire. Five hundred patients were included, with average age of 52±17 years (47% males). Only 17 patients had any relevant changes (3.4%, 95%CI=2 to 5.4%). The most frequent alterations included valve changes in 8 and diastolic dysfunction grade II in 6 patients. Eighty-seven examinations were performed to determine the level of agreement between patients and cardiologists. For the question "Is this test really necessary?", 92% of patients responded positively, compared with 5% of cardiologists (Kappa negative 0.04; P=0.01). The frequency of relevant findings was low in inadequate echocardiograms and patients and cardiologists had a different perception regarding its usefulness.

Citing Articles

Inappropriate screening of obstructive coronary artery disease during pre-anesthesia assessment of candidates for non-cardiac surgery.

Oliveira A, Santos L, Silva L, Lopes J, Schwingel P, Correia L Braz J Med Biol Res. 2021; 54(2):e10466.

PMID: 33439935 PMC: 7798136. DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X202010466.

References
1.
Colla C, Sequist T, Rosenthal M, Schpero W, Gottlieb D, Morden N . Use of non-indicated cardiac testing in low-risk patients: Choosing Wisely. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014; 24(2):149-53. PMC: 4303489. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003087. View

2.
Barachi L, Barbosa F, Moscavitch S, Pilon B, Pissinati G, Mesquita E . Inadequate request of transthoracic echocardiography according to the guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012; 99(4):952-4. DOI: 10.1590/s0066-782x2012001300012. View

3.
Cheitlin M, Alpert J, Armstrong W, Aurigemma G, Beller G, Bierman F . ACC/AHA guidelines for the clinical application of echocardiography: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Clinical Application of.... J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29(4):862-79. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)90000-5. View

4.
Ward R, Mansour I, Lemieux N, Gera N, Mehta R, Lang R . Prospective evaluation of the clinical application of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria for transthoracic echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009; 1(5):663-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.07.004. View

5.
Bhatia R, Milford C, Picard M, Weiner R . An educational intervention reduces the rate of inappropriate echocardiograms on an inpatient medical service. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 6(5):545-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.01.010. View