» Articles » PMID: 29845583

Anti-phospholipid IgG Antibodies Detected by Line Immunoassay Differentiate Patients with Anti-phospholipid Syndrome and Other Autoimmune Diseases

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 May 31
PMID 29845583
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) analyzed by line immunoassay (LIA) can recognize beta-glycoprotein I (βGPI) domain 1 (D1) epitopes depending on βGPI binding to distinct phospholipids. The aPL LIA was compared with consensus ELISA to investigate whether both techniques can discriminate anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) patients from aPL-positive, systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD) patients without clinical symptoms of APS and controls.

Methods: Thirty-four APS patients (14 arterial/venous thrombosis, 16 pregnancy morbidity, and 4 both), 41 patients with SARD lacking clinical APS criteria but demonstrating positivity for anti-βGPI (aβGPI) IgG, and 20 healthy subjects (HS) were tested for aPL to cardiolipin (aCL), phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol (aPG), phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylserine, βGPI, prothrombin, and annexin V by LIA. Samples were also tested for aCL, aβGPI, aβGPI-domain 1 (aD1), and aβGPI-domains 4-5 (aD4-5) by ELISA and for lupus anti-coagulant.

Results: Comparison of LIA with ELISA revealed a good agreement for the consensus criteria aPL aβGPI and aCL IgG (kappa = 0.69, 0.68, respectively) and a moderate agreement for IgM (kappa = 0.52, 0.49, respectively). Regarding ELISA, aD1/aD4-5 demonstrated the best performance of differentiating APS from asymptomatic SARD [area under the curve (AUC): 0.76]. aPG IgG had the best performance by LIA (AUC: 0.72) not significantly different from aD1/aD4-5. There was a good agreement for aPG IgG with aD1/aD4-5 (kappa = 0.71).

Conclusions: aD1/aD4-5 (ELISA) and aPG IgG (LIA) differentiate APS from SARD patients. PG appears to interact with βGPI of APS patients and exposes D1 thereof for disease-specific aPL binding in LIA.

Citing Articles

16th International congress on antiphospholipid antibodies task force report on antiphospholipid syndrome laboratory diagnostics and trends.

Atsumi T, Chighizola C, Fujieda Y, Mackie I, Radin M, Roubey R Lupus. 2023; 32(14):1625-1636.

PMID: 37933818 PMC: 10666497. DOI: 10.1177/09612033231211820.


Thrombosis and Hyperinflammation in COVID-19 Acute Phase Are Related to Anti-Phosphatidylserine and Anti-Phosphatidylinositol Antibody Positivity.

Alijotas-Reig J, Anunciacion-Llunell A, Morales-Perez S, Trape J, Esteve-Valverde E, Miro-Mur F Biomedicines. 2023; 11(8).

PMID: 37626797 PMC: 10452204. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11082301.


Recent advances in the detection of glioblastoma, from imaging-based methods to proteomics and biosensors: A narrative review.

Hosseini A, Ashraf H, Rahimi F, Alipourfard I, Alivirdiloo V, Hashemi B Cancer Cell Int. 2023; 23(1):98.

PMID: 37210528 PMC: 10199620. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-023-02947-1.


Inactivation of Yes-Associated Protein Mediates Trophoblast Dysfunction: A New Mechanism of Pregnancy Loss Associated with Anti-Phospholipid Antibodies?.

Huang Z, Tang Z, Guan H, Leung W, Wang L, Xia H Biomedicines. 2022; 10(12).

PMID: 36552052 PMC: 9776042. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123296.


Differences in Antiphospholipid Antibody Profile between Patients with Obstetric and Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Anunciacion-Llunell A, Munoz C, Roggenbuck D, Frasca S, Pardos-Gea J, Esteve-Valverde E Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(21).

PMID: 36361608 PMC: 9658219. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232112819.


References
1.
Meroni P, Borghi M, Raschi E, Tedesco F . Pathogenesis of antiphospholipid syndrome: understanding the antibodies. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011; 7(6):330-9. DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2011.52. View

2.
Nalli C, Piantoni S, Andreoli L, Motta M, Tincani A . Antiphospholipid syndrome and antiphospholipid antibodies in children: the two sides of the coin. Isr Med Assoc J. 2012; 14(5):310-2. View

3.
Pengo V, Banzato A, Denas G, Padayattil Jose S, Bison E, Hoxha A . Correct laboratory approach to APS diagnosis and monitoring. Autoimmun Rev. 2012; 12(8):832-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.11.008. View

4.
Andreoli L, Chighizola C, Nalli C, Gerosa M, Borghi M, Pregnolato F . Clinical characterization of antiphospholipid syndrome by detection of IgG antibodies against β2 -glycoprotein i domain 1 and domain 4/5: ratio of anti-domain 1 to anti-domain 4/5 as a useful new biomarker for antiphospholipid syndrome. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67(8):2196-204. DOI: 10.1002/art.39187. View

5.
Roggenbuck D, Borghi M, Somma V, Buttner T, Schierack P, Hanack K . Antiphospholipid antibodies detected by line immunoassay differentiate among patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, with infections and asymptomatic carriers. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016; 18(1):111. PMC: 4875598. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-016-1018-x. View