» Articles » PMID: 29845381

Effects of Flow Disruptions on Mental Workload and Surgical Performance in Robotic-Assisted Surgery

Overview
Journal World J Surg
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2018 May 31
PMID 29845381
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Robotic systems introduced new surgical and technical demands. Surgical flow disruptions are critical for maintaining operating room (OR) teamwork and patient safety. Specifically for robotic surgery, effects of intra-operative disruptive events for OR professionals' workload, stress, and performance have not been investigated yet. This study aimed to identify flow disruptions and assess their association with mental workload and performance during robotic-assisted surgery.

Methods: Structured expert-observations to identify different disruption types during 40 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies were conducted. Additionally, 216 postoperative reports on mental workload (mental demands, situational stress, and distractions) and performance of all OR professionals were collected.

Results: On average 15.8 flow disruptions per hour were observed with the highest rate after abdominal insufflation and before console time. People entering the OR caused most flow disruptions. Disruptions due to equipment showed the highest severity of interruption. Workload significantly correlated with severity of disruptions due to coordination and communication.

Conclusions: Flow disruptions occur frequently and are associated with increased workload. Therefore, strategies are needed to manage disruptions to maintain OR teamwork and safety during robotic-assisted surgery.

Citing Articles

Learning curve analysis of extraperitoneal single-site robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a CUSUM-based approach.

Wu J, Wang Y, Huang Y, Long X, Tang J, Gu D J Robot Surg. 2025; 19(1):49.

PMID: 39792294 PMC: 11723840. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02202-3.


Comparative analysis of disruptive events in robotic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Al-Hakim L, Wang M, Zhang Z, Xiao J, Sengupta S J Robot Surg. 2025; 19(1):44.

PMID: 39760830 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02194-0.


Intraoperative workload of the surgeon in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Yilmaz M, Karaaslan M, Sirin M, Polat M, Aybal H, Toprak T J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):289.

PMID: 39039389 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02049-8.


Surgical counting interruptions in operating rooms.

Lujun Z, Yuan G, Wei W BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):241.

PMID: 38600519 PMC: 11008047. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-01912-1.


Operating room organization and surgical performance: a systematic review.

Pasquer A, Ducarroz S, Lifante J, Skinner S, Poncet G, Duclos A Patient Saf Surg. 2024; 18(1):5.

PMID: 38287316 PMC: 10826254. DOI: 10.1186/s13037-023-00388-3.


References
1.
Parker S, Laviana A, Wadhera R, Wiegmann D, Sundt 3rd T . Development and evaluation of an observational tool for assessing surgical flow disruptions and their impact on surgical performance. World J Surg. 2009; 34(2):353-61. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0312-z. View

2.
Neyens D, Bayramzadeh S, Catchpole K, Joseph A, Taaffe K, Jurewicz K . Using a systems approach to evaluate a circulating nurse's work patterns and workflow disruptions. Appl Ergon. 2018; 78:293-300. PMC: 6165699. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.03.017. View

3.
Wilson M, Poolton J, Malhotra N, Ngo K, Bright E, Masters R . Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the surgery task load index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg. 2011; 35(9):1961-9. PMC: 3152702. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1141-4. View

4.
Dru C, Anger J, Souders C, Bresee C, Weigl M, Hallett E . Surgical flow disruptions during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2017; 24(3):8814-8821. PMC: 11185999. View

5.
Widmer L, Keller S, Tschan F, Semmer N, Holzer E, Candinas D . More Than Talking About the Weekend: Content of Case-Irrelevant Communication Within the OR Team. World J Surg. 2018; 42(7):2011-2017. PMC: 5990573. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4442-4. View