» Articles » PMID: 29845083

Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit and Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2018 May 31
PMID 29845083
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is an association between throwing activity and glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD). An 18° to 20° deficit has been adopted as the standard definition of pathological GIRD, but specific findings as to how GIRD relates to an injury are inconsistent.

Purpose: To systematically review the literature to clarify the definition of GIRD diagnosis for adolescent and adult overhead athletes and to examine the association between GIRD and an increased risk of injuries in these athletes.

Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed. Observational studies comparing glenohumeral internal rotation range of motion (ROM) in injured and uninjured overhead athletes were included for the meta-analysis. Studies of adolescent and adult athletes were analyzed separately. ROM was compared for the injured and uninjured groups, and a weighted mean GIRD was estimated. To account for potential heterogeneity across studies, both fixed- and random-effects models were used to calculate a standardized mean difference (SMD).

Results: Nine studies of level 3 or 4 evidence were included. From these, 12 study groups (4 adolescent, 8 adult) comprising 819 overhead athletes (226 injured, 593 uninjured) were included in the meta-analysis. The estimated SMD in GIRD between the injured and uninjured groups was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.15-0.77; < .01) for the overall sample. The between-group effect was larger for adults (SMD, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.18 to 1.02]; < .01) than adolescents (SMD, 0.20 [95% CI, -0.24 to 0.63]; = .13). The weighted mean GIRD for the injured and uninjured groups was 13.8° ± 5.6° and 9.6° ± 3.0°, respectively, which also differed by age group. Moderate study heterogeneity was observed ( = 69.0%).

Conclusion: Based on this systematic review, the current definition of pathological GIRD may be too conservative, and a distinct definition may be required for adolescent and adult athletes. While the results indicate a link between internal rotation deficits and upper extremity injuries in the overhead athlete, higher quality prospective research is needed to clarify the role that GIRD plays in future injuries to overhead athletes of various ages.

Citing Articles

Assessing Active and Passive Glenohumeral Rotational Deficits in Professional Tennis Players: Use of Normative Values at 90° and 45° of Abduction to Make Decisions in Injury-Prevention Programs.

Terre M, Tlaiye J, Solana-Tramunt M Sports (Basel). 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39852597 PMC: 11768688. DOI: 10.3390/sports13010001.


Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit: insights into pathologic, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic characteristics.

Fares M, Lawand J, Daher M, Suarez J, Kayepkian T, Koa J Clin Shoulder Elb. 2024; 27(4):505-513.

PMID: 38738331 PMC: 11615455. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2023.00885.


Preparation For Flight: The Physical Profile of Pre-Professional and Professional Circus Artists in the United States.

Greenspan S, Stuckey M Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024; 19(5):591-608.

PMID: 38707849 PMC: 11065775. DOI: 10.26603/001c.116332.


Combined Effects of Glenohumeral Mobilization, Stretching, and Thoracic Manipulation on Shoulder Internal Rotation Range of Motion.

Swanson B, Hagenbruch M, Lapaan B, Skipalskiy K Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024; 19(4):394-409.

PMID: 38699673 PMC: 11065457. DOI: 10.26603/001c.95040.


Participants with restricted dominant shoulder internal rotation range of motion demonstrate no side-to-side difference in humeral head translation; and no difference before and after joint mobilization: a pilot study.

Hoops J, Hooper T, Sobczak S, Kapila J, Dewan B, Matthijs O J Phys Ther Sci. 2024; 36(5):259-266.

PMID: 38694012 PMC: 11060773. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.36.259.


References
1.
Shanley E, Rauh M, Michener L, Ellenbecker T, Garrison J, Thigpen C . Shoulder range of motion measures as risk factors for shoulder and elbow injuries in high school softball and baseball players. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39(9):1997-2006. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511408876. View

2.
Beitzel K, Beitzel K, Zandt J, Buchmann S, Schwirtz A, Imhoff A . Premature cystic lesions in shoulders of elite junior javelin and volleyball athletes: a comparative evaluation using 3.0 Tesla MRI. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 22(6):792-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.012. View

3.
Tate A, Turner G, Knab S, Jorgensen C, Strittmatter A, Michener L . Risk factors associated with shoulder pain and disability across the lifespan of competitive swimmers. J Athl Train. 2012; 47(2):149-58. PMC: 3418126. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.2.149. View

4.
Ray T . Youth baseball injuries: recognition, treatment, and prevention. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2010; 9(5):294-8. DOI: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e3181f27403. View

5.
Parks E, Ray T . Prevention of overuse injuries in young baseball pitchers. Sports Health. 2012; 1(6):514-7. PMC: 3445152. DOI: 10.1177/1941738109343543. View