» Articles » PMID: 29808468

Keeping Our Eyes on the Prize: Focusing on Parenting Supports Depressed Parents' Involvement in Home Visiting Services

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2018 May 30
PMID 29808468
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives Improving family retention and engagement is crucial to the success of home visiting programs. Little is known about retaining and engaging depressed parents in services. The purpose of the study is to examine how home visit content moderates the association between depression and retention and engagement. Methods The sample (N = 1322) was served by Healthy Families America (n = 618) and Parents as Teachers (n = 704) between April 1, 2012 and June 30, 2016. Parents averaged 23 years (SD = 6). Nearly half of the parents were White (48%) and the majority was single (71%). Depression was screened with the Patient Health Questionnaire-2. Home visitors reported the percent of time focused on particular content and parent engagement at every home visit. Results Multilevel regression analyses showed the amount of time that home visitors spent supporting parent-child interaction moderated the association between depression and retention at 6 (B = .08, SE = .03, p = .003) and 12 (B = .1, SE = .03, p < .001) months, such that there was a stronger positive association for depressed parents. The main effects of child development focused content and retention at 6 (B = .07, SE = .01, p < .001) and 12 (B = .08, SE = .01, p < .001) months were positive, while effects of case management focused content at 6 (B = - .06, SE = .01, p < .001) and 12 (B = - .07, SE = .01, p < .001) months were negative. Conclusions Families were more likely to be retained when home visitors focused on child development and parent-child interaction, but less likely with more case management focus. Parents with positive depression screens were more likely to remain in services with more time spent focused on supporting parent-child interactions.

Citing Articles

Relationship-Based Home Visiting Services for Families Affected by Substance Use Disorders: A Qualitative Study.

Peacock-Chambers E, Buckley D, Lowell A, Clark M, Friedmann P, Byatt N J Child Fam Stud. 2023; 31(8):2121-2133.

PMID: 36909674 PMC: 9997720. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-022-02313-1.


Quality of delivery of "right@home": Implementation evaluation of an Australian sustained nurse home visiting intervention to improve parenting and the home learning environment.

Kemp L, Bruce T, Elcombe E, Anderson T, Vimpani G, Price A PLoS One. 2019; 14(5):e0215371.

PMID: 31059504 PMC: 6502332. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215371.

References
1.
OBrien R, Moritz P, Luckey D, McClatchey M, Ingoldsby E, Olds D . Mixed methods analysis of participant attrition in the nurse-family partnership. Prev Sci. 2012; 13(3):219-28. PMC: 3596156. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-012-0287-0. View

2.
Burrell L, Crowne S, Ojo K, Snead R, ONeill K, Cluxton-Keller F . Mother and Home Visitor Emotional Well-Being and Alignment on Goals for Home Visiting as Factors for Program Engagement. Matern Child Health J. 2018; 22(Suppl 1):43-51. PMC: 6153724. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-018-2535-9. View

3.
Lovejoy M, Graczyk P, OHare E, Neuman G . Maternal depression and parenting behavior: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2000; 20(5):561-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7358(98)00100-7. View

4.
Sanders M, Markie-Dadds C, Tully L, Bor W . The triple P-positive parenting program: a comparison of enhanced, standard, and self-directed behavioral family intervention for parents of children with early onset conduct problems. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000; 68(4):624-40. View

5.
Olson A, Dietrich A, Prazar G, Hurley J, Tuddenham A, Hedberg V . Two approaches to maternal depression screening during well child visits. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2005; 26(3):169-76. DOI: 10.1097/00004703-200506000-00002. View