» Articles » PMID: 29806471

D-Dimer Assessment Improves the Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index for In-Hospital Risk Stratification in Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Abstract

d-dimer (DD) levels are used in the diagnostic workup of suspected acute pulmonary embolism (APE), but data on DD for early risk stratification in APE are limited. In this post hoc analysis of a prospective observational study of 270 consecutive patients, we aimed to optimize the discriminant capacity of the simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (sPESI), an APE risk assessment score currently used, by combining it with DD for in-hospital adverse event prediction. We found that DD levels were higher in patients with complicated versus benign clinical course 7.2 mg/L (25th-75th percentile: 4.5-27.7 mg/L) versus 5.1 mg/L (25th-75th percentile: 2.1-11.2 mg/L), P = .004. The area under the curve of DD for serious adverse event (SAE) was 0.672, P = .003. d-dimer =1.35 mg/L showed 100% negative predictive value for SAE and identified 11 sPESI ≥1 patients with a benign clinical course, detecting the 1 patient with SAE from sPESI = 0. d-dimer >15 mg/L showed heart rate for SAE 3.04 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1-9). A stratification model which with sPESI + DD >1.35 mg/L demonstrated improved prognostic value when compared to sPESI alone (net reclassification improvement: 0.085, P = .04). d-dimer have prognostic value, values <1.35 mg/L identify patients with a favorable outcome, improving the prognostic potential of sPESI, while DD >15 mg/L is an independent predictor of SAE.

Citing Articles

Predictive value and optimal cut-off level of high-sensitivity troponin T in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Kim M, Seo C, Kim Y, Kim H, Kim H, Cho Y Korean J Intern Med. 2025; 40(1):65-77.

PMID: 39778527 PMC: 11725470. DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2024.131.


Diagnostic performance of D-dimer in predicting venous thromboembolism and acute aortic dissection.

Koch V, Biener M, Muller-Hennessen M, Vafaie M, Staudacher I, Katus H Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020; 10(5):559–566.

PMID: 32186398 PMC: 8248847. DOI: 10.1177/2048872620907322.

References
1.
Schulman S, Kearon C . Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2005; 3(4):692-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01204.x. View

2.
Klok F, Djurabi R, Nijkeuter M, Eikenboom H, Leebeek F, Kramer M . High D-dimer level is associated with increased 15-d and 3 months mortality through a more central localization of pulmonary emboli and serious comorbidity. Br J Haematol. 2007; 140(2):218-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06888.x. View

3.
Vuilleumier N, Le Gal G, Verschuren F, Perrier A, Bounameaux H, Turck N . Cardiac biomarkers for risk stratification in non-massive pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study. J Thromb Haemost. 2008; 7(3):391-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03260.x. View

4.
Masotti L, Righini M, Vuilleumier N, Antonelli F, Landini G, Cappelli R . Prognostic stratification of acute pulmonary embolism: focus on clinical aspects, imaging, and biomarkers. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009; 5(4):567-75. PMC: 2710971. DOI: 10.2147/vhrm.s4861. View

5.
Lobo J, Zorrilla V, Aizpuru F, Grau E, Jimenez D, Palareti G . D-dimer levels and 15-day outcome in acute pulmonary embolism. Findings from the RIETE Registry. J Thromb Haemost. 2009; 7(11):1795-801. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03576.x. View