» Articles » PMID: 29805957

The Living Donor Lost Wages Trial: Study Rationale and Protocol

Overview
Date 2018 May 29
PMID 29805957
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: This paper describes the background, rationale, and design of an NIH-funded, single-center study to test the impact of offering reimbursement for donor lost wages incurred during the post-nephrectomy recovery period on the live donor kidney transplant (LDKT) rate in newly evaluated kidney transplant candidates, to examine whether offering reimbursement for donor lost wages reduces racial disparity in LDKT rates, and to determine whether higher reimbursement amounts lead to higher LDKT rates.

Recent Findings: LDKT is the optimal treatment for renal failure. However, living kidney donation has declined in the past decade, particularly among men, younger adults, blacks, and low-income adults. There is evidence that donation-related costs may deter both transplant candidates and potential donors from considering LDKT. Lost wages is a major source of financial loss for some living donors and, unlike travel and lodging expenses, is not reimbursed by financial assistance programs.

Summary: The study addresses the transplant community's call to reduce the financial burden of living donation and examine its impact on LDKT rates. Findings have the potential to influence policy, clinical practice, LDKT access, and income-related and racial disparities in LDKT and living donation.

Citing Articles

Distinct clinical profiles and post-transplant outcomes among kidney transplant recipients with lower education levels: uncovering patterns through machine learning clustering.

Thongprayoon C, Miao J, Jadlowiec C, Mao S, Mao M, Leeaphorn N Ren Fail. 2023; 45(2):2292163.

PMID: 38087474 PMC: 11001364. DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2292163.


Removing Disincentives to Kidney Donation: A Quantitative Analysis.

McCormick F, Held P, Chertow G, Peters T, Roberts J J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019; 30(8):1349-1357.

PMID: 31345987 PMC: 6683718. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2019030242.

References
1.
Mittelman M, Thiessen C, Chon W, Clayville K, Cronin D, Fisher J . Miscommunicating NOTA Can Be Costly to Living Donors. Am J Transplant. 2016; 17(2):578-580. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14036. View

2.
Lacetera N, Macis M, Stith S . Removing financial barriers to organ and bone marrow donation: the effect of leave and tax legislation in the U.S. J Health Econ. 2013; 33:43-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.10.006. View

3.
Venkataramani A, Martin E, Vijayan A, Wellen J . The impact of tax policies on living organ donations in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2012; 12(8):2133-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04044.x. View

4.
Hart A, Smith J, Skeans M, Gustafson S, Stewart D, Cherikh W . OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Kidney. Am J Transplant. 2017; 17 Suppl 1:21-116. PMC: 5527691. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14124. View

5.
LaPointe Rudow D, Hays R, Baliga P, Cohen D, Cooper M, Danovitch G . Consensus conference on best practices in live kidney donation: recommendations to optimize education, access, and care. Am J Transplant. 2015; 15(4):914-22. PMC: 4516059. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13173. View