» Articles » PMID: 29799987

Characteristics of Radiotherapy Trials Compared With Other Oncological Clinical Trials in the Past 10 Years

Overview
Journal JAMA Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 May 26
PMID 29799987
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Modern precision radiotherapy is an innovative and effective treatment of cancer, yet it is unclear how radiotherapy trials are affected by expanding targeted and immune therapies and declining National Institutes of Health funding.

Objective: To analyze and compare the characteristics of radiotherapy trials with other oncological trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This is a cross-sectional analysis of trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between June 1, 2007, and May 8, 2017. Records of all 243 758 clinical studies registered by May 8, 2017, were downloaded, but only 25 907 interventional oncological trials registered between June 1, 2007, and May 8, 2017, and whose primary purpose was "treatment" were included in the final analysis. Trials were categorized according to cancer type and other registration information.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Characteristics of radiotherapy trials were compared with characteristics of other oncological trials. Chronological shifts in radiotherapy trials were also analyzed.

Results: Of the 25 907 trials selected, 1378 (5.3%) were radiotherapy trials and 24 529 (94.7%) were other oncological studies. The number of radiotherapy trials increased gradually from 94 (June 1, 2007, through May 31, 2008) to 192 (June 1, 2015, through May 31, 2016). Radiotherapy trials were less likely than other oncological studies to be registered before participant enrollment (763 of 1370 [55.7%] vs 16 105 of 24 434 [65.9%]; P < .001), to be blinded (45 of 1378 [3.3%] vs 2784 of 24 529 [11.3%]; P < .001), or to involve multiple geographic regions (2.4% vs 9.5%; P < .001), but they were more likely to be phase 2 to 3 (773 of 1124 [68.8%] vs 12 910 of 22 300 [57.9%]; P < .001) and to have a data-monitoring committee (839 of 1264 [66.4%] vs 11 728 of 21 060 [55.7%]; P < .001). Only a minority of radiotherapy trials were industry sponsored, which was significantly lower than for other oncological trials (80 of 1378 [5.8%] vs 10 651 of 24 529 [43.4%]; P < .001; adjusted odds ratio, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.06-0.10). The number of National Institutes of Health-sponsored radiotherapy trials decreased from 80 of 544 trials (14.7%) from 2007 to 2012 to 72 of 834 trials (8.6%) from 2012 to 2017 (P < .001). Radiotherapy trials with a sample size of more than 100 patients decreased from 155 of 543 trials (28.5%) from 2007 to 2012 to 157 of 833 trials (18.8%) from 2012 to 2017 (P < .001).

Conclusions And Relevance: The limited number of and the scarcity of funding for radiotherapy trials is concerning given the integral role of radiotherapy in the clinical management of patients with cancer worldwide. A multidisciplinary collaboration to promote and fund more radiotherapy research is warranted.

Citing Articles

BRD7 enhances the radiosensitivity of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells by negatively regulating USP5/METTL3 axis-mediated homologous recombination repair.

Li M, Wei J, Xue C, Chen S, Zhou X, Zheng L Int J Biol Sci. 2024; 20(15):6130-6145.

PMID: 39664566 PMC: 11628346. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.100833.


Characteristics of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Ursoleo J, Bugo S, Losiggio R, Bottussi A, Agosta V, Monaco F J Clin Med. 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39336907 PMC: 11432273. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185421.


Integrating Audiovisual Immersion Into Pediatric Radiation Therapy Across Multiple Centers: Methodology, Timeliness, and Cost of the Audiovisual-Assisted Therapeutic Ambience in Radiation Therapy Prospective Multi-Institutional Trial.

Oh J, Skinner L, Gutkin P, Jiang A, Donaldson S, Loo Jr B Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024; 9(10):101589.

PMID: 39309703 PMC: 11415686. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101589.


Survey of research attitudes of RTTs working in Scotland: A Scottish radiographer research forum collaboration.

Paterson A, Devlin L, Mitchell J, Ogg J, Farnan K, Coupland S Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2024; 30:100248.

PMID: 38707714 PMC: 11067355. DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100248.


The landscape of investigator-initiated oncology trials conducted in mainland China during the past decade (2010-2019).

Cao Y, Ye L, Fan Z, Yang W, Chen L, Mei Y Cancer Innov. 2023; 2(1):79-90.

PMID: 38090374 PMC: 10686146. DOI: 10.1002/cai2.58.


References
1.
Le Q, Welch J, Vermorken J, Rischin D, Mehanna H . Formation of an international intergroup to coordinate clinical trials in head and neck cancers: HNCIG. Oral Oncol. 2017; 71:180-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.05.022. View

2.
Peto R, Collins R, Gray R . Large-scale randomized evidence: large, simple trials and overviews of trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995; 48(1):23-40. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00150-o. View

3.
Chang J, Senan S, Paul M, Mehran R, Louie A, Balter P . Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16(6):630-7. PMC: 4489408. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70168-3. View

4.
Holliday E, Frank S . Proton radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a review of the clinical experience to date. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014; 89(2):292-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.02.029. View

5.
Nyman J, Hallqvist A, Lund J, Brustugun O, Bergman B, Bergstrom P . SPACE - A randomized study of SBRT vs conventional fractionated radiotherapy in medically inoperable stage I NSCLC. Radiother Oncol. 2016; 121(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.015. View