» Articles » PMID: 29799861

Seamless Recording of Glucometer Measurements Among Older Experienced Diabetic Patients - A Study of Perception and Usability

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 May 26
PMID 29799861
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Self-measurement and documentation of blood-glucose are critical elements of diabetes management, particularly in regimes including insulin. In this study, we analyze the usability of iBG-STAR, the first blood glucose meter connectable to a smartphone. This technology records glucometer measurements, removing the burden of documentation from diabetic patients. This study assesses the potential for implementation of iBG-STAR in routine care. Twelve long-term diabetic patients (4 males; median age of 66.5 years) were enrolled in the study. N = 4/12 reported diabetic polyneuropathy. Reported subjective mental workload for all tasks related to iBG-STAR was on average lower than 12 points, corresponding to the verbal code 'nearly no effort needed'. A "Post Study System Usability Questionnaire", evaluated the glucometer at an average value of 2.06 (SD = 1.02) on a 7-Likert-scale (1 = 'I fully agree' to 7 = 'I completely disagree') for usability. These results represent a positive user-experience. Patients with polyneuropathy may experience physical difficulties in completing the tasks, thereby affecting usability. Technologically savvy patients (n = 6) with a positive outlook on diabetes assessed the product as a suitable tool for themselves and would recommend to other diabetic patients. The main barrier to regular use was treating physicians' inability to retrieve digitally recorded data. This barrier was due to a shortcoming in interoperability of mobile devices and medical information systems.

Citing Articles

Defining Documentation Burden (DocBurden) and Excessive DocBurden for All Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.

Levy D, Withall J, Mishuris R, Tiase V, Diamond C, Douthit B Appl Clin Inform. 2024; 15(5):898-913.

PMID: 39137903 PMC: 11524753. DOI: 10.1055/a-2385-1654.


Enhancing diabetes therapy adherence: a comprehensive study on glucometer usability for type 2 diabetes patients.

Toletti G, Boaretto A, Di Loreto C, Fornengo R, Gigante A, Perrone G Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2024; 5:1328181.

PMID: 38807703 PMC: 11130397. DOI: 10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1328181.


Evaluating Medical Devices Remotely: Current Methods and Potential Innovations.

McLaughlin A, DeLucia P, Drews F, Vaughn-Cooke M, Kumar A, Nesbitt R Hum Factors. 2020; 62(7):1041-1060.

PMID: 32960093 PMC: 7586009. DOI: 10.1177/0018720820953644.

References
1.
Renard E . Monitoring glycemic control: the importance of self-monitoring of blood glucose. Am J Med. 2005; 118(Suppl 9A):12S-19S. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.07.052. View

2.
Lithgow K, Edwards A, Rabi D . Smartphone App Use for Diabetes Management: Evaluating Patient Perspectives. JMIR Diabetes. 2018; 2(1):e2. PMC: 6238843. DOI: 10.2196/diabetes.6643. View

3.
Free C, Phillips G, Watson L, Galli L, Felix L, Edwards P . The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2013; 10(1):e1001363. PMC: 3566926. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001363. View

4.
Stone A, Shiffman S, Schwartz J, Broderick J, Hufford M . Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Control Clin Trials. 2003; 24(2):182-99. DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00320-3. View

5.
Pfutzner A, Mitri M, Musholt P, Sachsenheimer D, Borchert M, Yap A . Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012; 28(4):525-31. DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2012.673479. View