» Articles » PMID: 29798639

[Research Development of Computer Assisted Navigation and Robotics in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty]

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2018 May 26
PMID 29798639
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To summarize the computer assisted navigation and robotics in the classification of knee surgery, and the development, surgical indications and contraindication, effectiveness, and the research progress of computer assisted navigation and robotics in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

Methods: The related literature on computer assisted navigation and robotics in UKA was extensively reviewed, summarized, and analyzed.

Results: Recently, satisfactory results have been achieved in UKA for the treatment of single compartmental knee osteoarthritis. With the rapid development of computer navigation and robotic technology gradually combined with clinical practice, the great precision and accuracy of implant have been improved in computer navigation and robotics in UKA surgery. Postoperative function is well recovered, meanwhile, prosthesis survival can be significantly increased.

Conclusion: Computer assisted navigation and robotics in UKA can greatly improve the accuracy of the implant when compared with traditional UKA. The early effectiveness is satisfactory, but the long-term effectiveness still needs to be further observed.

Citing Articles

[Study on accuracy of prosthesis size selection for Naton robot-assisted medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty].

Chen L, Song Y, Gu W, Nan S, Meng Z, Li H Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024; 38(11):1312-1316.

PMID: 39542620 PMC: 11563753. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202406060.


[Research progress of failure and revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Guo S, Guan S, Liu N Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023; 37(2):221-227.

PMID: 36796820 PMC: 9970781. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202211013.


[Short-term effectiveness of acetabular reconstruction with three-dimensional printed trabecular metal pads in hip revision].

Zhang Z, Zhao J, Huang X, Jiang H, Xu Z Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019; 33(12):1516-1520.

PMID: 31823550 PMC: 8355799. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201905010.

References
1.
Jeer P, Keene G, Gill P . Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an intermediate report of survivorship after the introduction of a new system with analysis of failures. Knee. 2004; 11(5):369-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2004.06.001. View

2.
Manzotti A, Cerveri P, Pullen C, Confalonieri N . Computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using dedicated software versus a conventional technique. Int Orthop. 2013; 38(2):457-63. PMC: 3923948. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2215-8. View

3.
Jenny J, Boeri C . Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003; 11(1):40-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-002-0333-8. View

4.
Dowd G, Somayaji H, Uthukuri M . High tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis. Knee. 2006; 13(2):87-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2005.08.002. View

5.
Cossey A, Spriggins A . The use of computer-assisted surgical navigation to prevent malalignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(1):29-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.10.012. View