» Articles » PMID: 29793471

Surgical Informed Consent in Obstetric and Gynecologic Surgeries: Experience from a Comprehensive Teaching Hospital in Southern Ethiopia

Overview
Journal BMC Med Ethics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2018 May 26
PMID 29793471
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Surgical Informed Consent (SIC) has long been recognized as an important component of modern medicine. The ultimate goals of SIC are to improve clients' understanding of the intended procedure, increase client satisfaction, maintain trust between clients and health providers, and ultimately minimize litigation issues related to surgical procedures. The purpose of the current study is to assess the comprehensiveness of the SIC process for women undergoing obstetric and gynecologic surgeries.

Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was undertaken at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (HUCSH) in November and December, 2016. A total of 230 women who underwent obstetric and/or gynecologic surgeries were interviewed immediately after their hospital discharge to assess their experience of the SIC process. Thirteen components of SIC were used based on international recommendations, including the Royal College of Surgeon's standards of informed consent practices for surgical procedures. Descriptive summaries are presented in tables and figures.

Results: Forty percent of respondents were aged between 25 and 29 years. Nearly a quarter (22.6%) had no formal education. More than half (54.3%) of respondents had undergone an emergency surgical procedure. Only 18.4% of respondents reported that the surgeon performing the operation had offered SIC, while 36.6% of respondents could not recall who had offered SIC. All except one respondent provided written consent to undergo a surgical procedure. However, 8.3% of respondents received SIC service while already on the operation table for their procedure. Only 73.9% of respondents were informed about the availability (or lack thereof) of alternative treatment options. Additionally, a majority of respondents were not informed about the type of anesthesia to be used (88.3%) and related complications (87.4%). Only 54.2% of respondents reported that they had been offered at least six of the 13 SIC components used by the investigators.

Conclusions: There is gap in the provision of comprehensive and standardized pre-operative counseling for obstetric and gynecologic surgeries in the study hospital. This has a detrimental effect on the overall quality of care clients receive, specifically in terms of client expectations and information needs.

Citing Articles

Adequacy, Satisfaction, and Factors Associated With Information Provided During Consent: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Prosthodontic Patients at Selected Dental Facilities in Kampala, Uganda.

Ndagire B, Barugahare J, Rwenyonyi C, Nakigudde J, Naidoo S Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77189.

PMID: 39925572 PMC: 11806918. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77189.


Surgical informed consent practice and associated factors among adult postoperative patients in public hospitals of Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia 2023/2024. Cross sectional.

Gebreanenia F, Kahsay H, Belay D, Tesfay B, Mesele F, Abirha M PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0310920.

PMID: 39899541 PMC: 11790128. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310920.


Surgical Informed Consent in Clinical Practice: Patients' Perspective Undergoing Cesarean Section at Three Teaching Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Kebede E, Tasew T, Worku D Ethiop J Health Sci. 2024; 33(4):671-680.

PMID: 38784215 PMC: 11111191. DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v33i4.13.


Patient knowledge of surgical informed consent and shared decision-making process among surgical patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mihiretu M, Bekele E, Ayele K, Asmare L, Bayou F, Arefaynie M Patient Saf Surg. 2024; 18(1):2.

PMID: 38218929 PMC: 10787976. DOI: 10.1186/s13037-023-00386-5.


Surgical informed consent practices and influencing factors in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review of the literature.

Pittalis C, Sackey C, Okeny P, Nandi B, Gajewski J BMJ Qual Saf. 2023; 33(10):653-662.

PMID: 38160058 PMC: 11503148. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016823.


References
1.
Lawal Y, Garba E, Ogirima M, Dahiru I, Maitama M, Abubakar K . The doctrine of informed consent in surgical practice. Ann Afr Med. 2011; 10(1):1-5. DOI: 10.4103/1596-3519.76558. View

2.
Akkad A, Jackson C, Kenyon S, Dixon-Woods M, Taub N, Habiba M . Informed consent for elective and emergency surgery: questionnaire study. BJOG. 2004; 111(10):1133-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00240.x. View

3.
Siddiqui F, Shaikh J, Memon M . An audit of informed consent in surgical patients at a university hospital. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011; 22(1):133-5. View

4.
Luckner K, Weinfeld I . Informed consent as a parent involvement model in the NICU. Bioethics Forum. 1995; 11(1):35-41. View

5.
Anderson O, Wearne I . Informed consent for elective surgery--what is best practice?. J R Soc Med. 2007; 100(2):97-100. PMC: 1791005. DOI: 10.1177/014107680710000226. View