» Articles » PMID: 29792232

Effect of Postoperative Goal-directed Therapy in Cancer Patients Undergoing High-risk Surgery: a Randomized Clinical Trial and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) has been advocated in high-risk patients undergoing noncardiac surgery to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that using cardiac index (CI)-guided GDHT in the postoperative period for patients undergoing high-risk surgery for cancer treatment would reduce 30-day mortality and postoperative complications.

Methods: A randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial was performed in a tertiary oncology hospital. All adult patients undergoing high-risk cancer surgery who required intensive care unit admission were randomly allocated to a CI-guided GDHT group or to a usual care group. In the GDHT group, postoperative therapy aimed at CI ≥ 2.5 L/min/m using fluids, inotropes and red blood cells during the first 8 postoperative hours. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of 30-day all-cause mortality and severe postoperative complications during the hospital stay. A meta-analysis was also conducted including all randomized trials of postoperative GDHT published from 1966 to May 2017.

Results: A total of 128 patients (64 in each group) were randomized. The primary outcome occurred in 34 patients of the GDHT group and in 28 patients of the usual care group (53.1% vs 43.8%, absolute difference 9.4 (95% CI, - 7.8 to 25.8); p = 0.3). During the 8-h intervention period more patients in the GDHT group received dobutamine when compared to the usual care group (55% vs 16%, p < 0.001). A meta-analysis of nine randomized trials showed no differences in postoperative mortality (risk ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.59-1.23; p = 0.4; p for heterogeneity = 0.7; I = 0%) and in the overall complications rate (risk ratio 0.88, 95% CI 0.71-1.08; p = 0.2; p for heterogeneity = 0.07; I = 48%), but a reduced hospital length of stay in the GDHT group (mean difference (MD) - 1.6; 95% CI - 2.75 to - 0.46; p = 0.006; p for heterogeneity = 0.002; I = 74%).

Conclusions: CI-guided hemodynamic therapy in the first 8 postoperative hours does not reduce 30-day mortality and severe complications during hospital stay when compared to usual care in cancer patients undergoing high-risk surgery.

Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT01946269 . Registered on 16 September 2013.

Citing Articles

Restricted Versus Liberal Versus Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy for Non-vascular Abdominal Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Yang T, Tan A, Leung W, Chong D, Chow Y Cureus. 2023; 15(4):e38238.

PMID: 37261162 PMC: 10226838. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38238.


Reliability of stroke volume or pulse pressure variation as dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review.

Chen J, Zhao S, Zhu Q J Clin Monit Comput. 2022; 37(2):379-387.

PMID: 36399217 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00939-6.


Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDHT) in surgical patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of GDHT on post-operative pulmonary complications.

Dushianthan A, Knight M, Russell P, Grocott M Perioper Med (Lond). 2020; 9:30.

PMID: 33072306 PMC: 7560066. DOI: 10.1186/s13741-020-00161-5.


Perioperative restrictive versus goal-directed fluid therapy for adults undergoing major non-cardiac surgery.

Wrzosek A, Jakowicka-Wordliczek J, Zajaczkowska R, Serednicki W, Jankowski M, Bala M Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 12:CD012767.

PMID: 31829446 PMC: 6953415. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012767.pub2.


Association of conflicts of interest with the results and conclusions of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy research: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Zhang L, Dai F, Brackett A, Ai Y, Meng L Intensive Care Med. 2018; 44(10):1638-1656.

PMID: 30105599 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5345-z.

References
1.
Saugel B, Vincent J, Wagner J . Personalized hemodynamic management. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017; 23(4):334-341. DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000422. View

2.
Osawa E, Rhodes A, Landoni G, Galas F, Fukushima J, Park C . Effect of Perioperative Goal-Directed Hemodynamic Resuscitation Therapy on Outcomes Following Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Systematic Review. Crit Care Med. 2015; 44(4):724-33. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001479. View

3.
Polonen P, Ruokonen E, Hippelainen M, Poyhonen M, Takala J . A prospective, randomized study of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2000; 90(5):1052-9. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200005000-00010. View

4.
Pearse R, Harrison D, MacDonald N, Gillies M, Blunt M, Ackland G . Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014; 311(21):2181-90. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.5305. View

5.
McKendry M, McGloin H, Saberi D, Caudwell L, Brady A, Singer M . Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of a nurse delivered, flow monitored protocol for optimisation of circulatory status after cardiac surgery. BMJ. 2004; 329(7460):258. PMC: 498021. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38156.767118.7C. View