Language Experience Shapes Relational Knowledge of Compound Words

Overview

Journal Psychon Bull Rev

Specialty Psychology

Date 2018 May 24

PMID 29790123

Citations 3

Authors

Daniel Schmidtke

Christina L Gagne

Victor Kuperman

Thomas L Spalding

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Prior studies of noun-noun compound word processing have provided insight into the human capacity for conceptual combination (Gagné and Shoben Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(1), 71 1997; Spalding, Gagné, Mullaly & Ji Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft, 17, 283-315 2010). These studies conclude that relational interpretations of compound words are proposed and appraised by the language system during online word recognition. However, little is known about how the capacity for creating new meanings from existing conceptual units develops within an individual mind. Though current theories imply that individual relational knowledge about the combinability of concepts develops as language experience accumulates, this hypothesis has not been previously tested experimentally. Here, we addressed this hypothesis in a task that assesses individual relational knowledge of English compound words. We report that greater experience with printed language shapes relational knowledge of compound words in two ways. Firstly, individuals with more experience with printed language were able to select a greater number of possible relational meanings for individual compound words. Secondly, individuals with greater experience with printed language were also more precise about which relational meaning was the most semantically plausible out of all possible meanings. Our results confirm that language experience affects an individual's ability to use relational knowledge in order to combine conceptual units. Our findings offer further support for the Lexical Quality Hypothesis (Perfetti, 2007), which states that lexical representations of words become simultaneously more flexible and precise as a result of repeated exposure to their orthographic forms in language usage.

Citing Articles

From letters to composed concepts: A magnetoencephalography study of reading.

Flick G, Abdullah O, Pylkkanen L Hum Brain Mapp. 2021; 42(15):5130-5153.

PMID: 34402114 PMC: 8449097. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25608.

Psycholinguistic norms for a set of 506 French compound words.

Bonin P, Laroche B, Meot A Behav Res Methods. 2021; 54(1):393-413.

PMID: 34240336 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01601-w.

LADEC: The Large Database of English Compounds.

Gagne C, Spalding T, Schmidtke D Behav Res Methods. 2019; 51(5):2152-2179.

PMID: 31347038 PMC: 6797637. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01282-6.

References

Chateau D, Jared D . Exposure to print and word recognition processes. Mem Cognit. 2000; 28(1):143-53. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211582. View

Libben G, Gibson M, Yoon Y, Sandra D . Compound fracture: the role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain Lang. 2003; 84(1):50-64. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00520-5. View

Stanovich K, Cunningham A . Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: the cognitive correlates of print exposure. Mem Cognit. 1992; 20(1):51-68. DOI: 10.3758/bf03208254. View

Ashby J, Rayner K, Clifton C . Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: differential effects of frequency and predictability. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005; 58(6):1065-86. DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000476. View

Sears C, Campbell C, Lupker S . Is there a neighborhood frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006; 32(4):1040-62. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.1040. View

Aacheson D, Wellu J, MacDonald M . New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behav Res Methods. 2008; 40(1):278-89. PMC: 3022331. DOI: 10.3758/brm.40.1.278. View

Coolen R, van Jaarsveld H, Schreuder R . The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds. Mem Cognit. 1991; 19(4):341-52. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197138. View

Brysbaert M, New B . Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):977-90. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977. View

Hawelka S, Gagl B, Wimmer H . A dual-route perspective on eye movements of dyslexic readers. Cognition. 2010; 115(3):367-79. PMC: 2976468. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.004. View

10.

Andrews S, Hersch J . Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010; 139(2):299-318. DOI: 10.1037/a0018366. View

11.

Mol S, Bus A . To read or not to read: a meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychol Bull. 2011; 137(2):267-96. DOI: 10.1037/a0021890. View

12.

Kuperman V, Van Dyke J . Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading. J Mem Lang. 2011; 65(1):42-73. PMC: 3119501. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.03.002. View

13.

Yap M, Balota D, Sibley D, Ratcliff R . Individual differences in visual word recognition: insights from the English Lexicon Project. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011; 38(1):53-79. PMC: 3193910. DOI: 10.1037/a0024177. View

14.

Kuperman V, Van Dyke J . Reassessing word frequency as a determinant of word recognition for skilled and unskilled readers. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013; 39(3):802-23. PMC: 3719867. DOI: 10.1037/a0030859. View

15.

Stafford T, Dewar M . Tracing the trajectory of skill learning with a very large sample of online game players. Psychol Sci. 2014; 25(2):511-8. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613511466. View

16.

van Heuven W, Mandera P, Keuleers E, Brysbaert M . SUBTLEX-UK: a new and improved word frequency database for British English. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014; 67(6):1176-90. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521. View

17.

Juhasz B, Lai Y, Woodcock M . A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience. Behav Res Methods. 2014; 47(4):1004-1019. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0523-6. View

18.

Moore M, Gordon P . Reading ability and print exposure: item response theory analysis of the author recognition test. Behav Res Methods. 2014; 47(4):1095-1109. PMC: 4732519. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0534-3. View

19.

Falkauskas K, Kuperman V . When experience meets language statistics: Individual variability in processing English compound words. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015; 41(6):1607-27. PMC: 4630144. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000132. View

20.

Schmidtke D, Kuperman V, Gagne C, Spalding T . Competition between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: the role of entropy. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015; 23(2):556-70. PMC: 6507423. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0926-0. View