» Articles » PMID: 29785645

Concurrent Coupling of Realistic and Ideal Models of Liquids and Solids in Hamiltonian Adaptive Resolution Simulations

Overview
Publisher EDP Sciences
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2018 May 23
PMID 29785645
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To understand the properties of a complex system it is often illuminating to perform a comparison with a simpler, even idealised one. A prototypical application of this approach is the calculation of free energies and chemical potentials in liquids, which can be decomposed in the sum of ideal and excess contributions. In the same spirit, in computer simulations it is possible to extract useful information on a given system making use of setups where two models, an accurate one and a simpler one, are concurrently employed and directly coupled. Here, we tackle the issue of coupling atomistic or, more in general, interacting models of a system with the corresponding idealised representations: for a liquid, this is the ideal gas, i.e. a collection of non-interacting particles; for a solid, we employ the ideal Einstein crystal, a construct in which particles are decoupled from one another and restrained by a harmonic, exactly integrable potential. We describe in detail the practical and technical aspects of these simulations, and suggest that the concurrent usage and coupling of realistic and ideal models represents a promising strategy to investigate liquids and solids in silico.

Citing Articles

From adaptive resolution to molecular dynamics of open systems.

Cortes-Huerto R, Praprotnik M, Kremer K, Delle Site L Eur Phys J B. 2021; 94(9):189.

PMID: 34720711 PMC: 8547219. DOI: 10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00193-w.


SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding poses and binding affinities from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.

Sun Z J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2020; 35(1):105-115.

PMID: 32776199 DOI: 10.1007/s10822-020-00335-9.


Topical Issue on Dielectric Spectroscopy Applied to Soft Matter.

Napolitano S Eur Phys J E Soft Matter. 2020; 43(1):4.

PMID: 31974681 DOI: 10.1140/epje/i2020-11929-0.


Topical Issue on Advances in Computational Methods for Soft Matter Systems.

Rovigatti L, Romano F, Russo J Eur Phys J E Soft Matter. 2018; 41(8):98.

PMID: 30143882 DOI: 10.1140/epje/i2018-11695-6.

References
1.
Fennell C, Gezelter J . Is the Ewald summation still necessary? Pairwise alternatives to the accepted standard for long-range electrostatics. J Chem Phys. 2006; 124(23):234104. DOI: 10.1063/1.2206581. View

2.
Karplus M, McCammon J . Protein structural fluctuations during a period of 100 ps. Nature. 1979; 277(5697):578. DOI: 10.1038/277578a0. View

3.
Potestio R, Fritsch S, Espanol P, Delgado-Buscalioni R, Kremer K, Everaers R . Hamiltonian adaptive resolution simulation for molecular liquids. Phys Rev Lett. 2013; 110(10):108301. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.108301. View

4.
Csanyi G, Albaret T, Payne M, De Vita A . "Learn on the fly": a hybrid classical and quantum-mechanical molecular dynamics simulation. Phys Rev Lett. 2004; 93(17):175503. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.175503. View

5.
Tarenzi T, Calandrini V, Potestio R, Giorgetti A, Carloni P . Open Boundary Simulations of Proteins and Their Hydration Shells by Hamiltonian Adaptive Resolution Scheme. J Chem Theory Comput. 2017; 13(11):5647-5657. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00508. View