» Articles » PMID: 29782062

A Comparison of Quality Parameters of Fresh Feline Ejaculates Collected by Three Different Collection Techniques

Overview
Date 2018 May 22
PMID 29782062
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of our study was to compare the quality parameters of fresh feline ejaculates collected by three different techniques-urethral catheterization after medetomidine administration (CT), electroejaculation (EE) and epididymal slicing after orchiectomy (EP). A total of 34 adult male cats (Felis catus) were included in the study. In all male cats, the sperm collection was performed under general anaesthesia by three collection methods in the following order: urethral catheterization, electroejaculation and epididymal slicing. The sperm parameters evaluated were as follows: volume, motility, viability, sperm concentration, total sperm count and morphological examination. The highest quality semen parameters were achieved using EE. The comparison of results of the evaluated sperm quality parameters from EE and EP showed significant differences only in one case-the percentage of head abnormalities and lower percentage of head abnormalities were achieved using EE compared to EP: 8.5% (3.0%-21.0%) versus 10.0% (4.0%-22.0%). Semen collected by CT rendered the lowest quality samples when compared to sperm samples collected by EE and EP, especially with respect to the motility and total sperm count which were significantly lower (p < 0.001). Our study showed that sperm samples collected by EE and EP result in better quality of feline ejaculates compared to collection by CT from sperm samples collected from the same male cats. These results demonstrate the necessity of further research of urethral catheterization as a novel technique of semen collection in male cats.

Citing Articles

Effect of Medetomidine and Dexmedetomidine at Different Dosages on Cat Semen Quality Using Urethral Catheterization After Pharmacological Induction (UrCaPI).

Cunto M, Ballotta G, Contri A, Gloria A, Zambelli D Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(4).

PMID: 40002986 PMC: 11852349. DOI: 10.3390/ani15040504.


Artificial Insemination in Queens in the Clinical Practice Setting: Protocols and challenges.

Zambelli D, Cunto M J Feline Med Surg. 2022; 24(9):871-880.

PMID: 36002144 PMC: 10812221. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X221118756.


Establishment of semen collection technique using electroejaculator and semen cryopreservation of Javan leopard ( Cuvier, 1809).

Mulia B, Widianti A, Manansang J, Setiadi D, Yoelinda V, Nugraha T Vet World. 2022; 14(12):3156-3163.

PMID: 35153407 PMC: 8829418. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.3156-3163.


Comparative Analysis of piRNA Profiles Helps to Elucidate Cryoinjury Between Giant Panda and Boar Sperm During Cryopreservation.

Wang Y, Zhou Y, Ali M, Zhang J, Wang W, Huang Y Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8:635013.

PMID: 33969033 PMC: 8100531. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.635013.


Quality of domestic cat semen collected by urethral catheterization after the use of different alpha 2-adrenergic agonists.

Madrigal-Valverde M, Bittencourt R, Ribeiro Filho A, Barbosa V, Vieira C, Romao E J Feline Med Surg. 2020; 23(8):745-750.

PMID: 33206029 PMC: 10812191. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X20973183.