» Articles » PMID: 29774484

Effect of Post-filter Anticoagulation on Mortality in Patients with Cancer-associated Pulmonary Embolism

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 May 19
PMID 29774484
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Malignancy is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Inferior vena cava filters are a viable alternative when anticoagulation is infeasible because of the risk of bleeding. Although the current guidelines recommend that all patients with a vena cava filter be treated with anticoagulation treatment when the risk of bleeding is reduced, studies concerning the role of concomitant anticoagulation after vena cava filter insertion in high-risk patients are scarce. Since many cancer patients suffer from a high risk of hemorrhagic complications, we aimed to determine the effect of post-filter anticoagulation on mortality in patients with a malignant solid tumor.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with pulmonary embolism was performed between January 2010 and May 2016. Patients with a solid tumor and vena cava filter inserted because of pulmonary embolism were included. Using Cox proportional hazards model, the prognostic effect of clinical variables was analyzed.

Results: A total of 180 patients were analyzed, with 143 patients receiving and 37 patients not receiving post-filter anticoagulation treatment. Mortality was not significantly different between the two groups. The presence of metastatic cancer and that of pancreatobiliary cancer were significant risk factors for mortality. However, post-filter anticoagulation did not show significant effect on mortality regardless of the stage of cancer.

Conclusion: In patients with cancer-associated pulmonary embolism, the effect of post-filter anticoagulation on mortality may not be critical, especially in patients with a short life expectancy.

Citing Articles

Outcome of anticoagulation with rivaroxaban in patients with non-retrieved inferior vena cava filters for the prevention of filter thrombosis: a retrospective cohort study.

Wang B, Jiang C, Zhang Y, Li X, Xu H BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022; 22(1):406.

PMID: 36089586 PMC: 9464391. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02849-6.

References
1.
Jimenez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, Gomez V, Lobo J, Uresandi F . Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170(15):1383-9. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.199. View

2.
Mandala M, Falanga A, Roila F . Management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2011; 22 Suppl 6:vi85-92. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr392. View

3.
Ray Jr C, Mitchell E, Zipser S, Kao E, Brown C, Moneta G . Outcomes with retrievable inferior vena cava filters: a multicenter study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006; 17(10):1595-604. DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000239102.02956.65. View

4.
Cronin-Fenton D, Sondergaard F, Pedersen L, Fryzek J, Cetin K, Acquavella J . Hospitalisation for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients and the general population: a population-based cohort study in Denmark, 1997-2006. Br J Cancer. 2010; 103(7):947-53. PMC: 2965880. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605883. View

5.
Chow F, Chan Y, Cheung G, Cheng S . Mid- and long-term outcome of patients with permanent inferior vena cava filters: a single center review. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015; 29(5):985-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.01.009. View