» Articles » PMID: 29772018

The Cost-effectiveness of Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab and Aflibercept for the Treatment of Age-related Macular Degeneration-A Cost-effectiveness Analysis from a Societal Perspective

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 May 18
PMID 29772018
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The discussion on the use of bevacizumab is still ongoing and often doctors are deterred from using bevacizumab due to legal or political issues. Bevacizumab is an effective, safe and inexpensive treatment option for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), albeit unregistered for the disease. Therefore, in some countries ophthalmologists use the equally effective but expensive drugs ranibizumab and aflibercept. We describe the economic consequences of this dilemma surrounding AMD treatment from a societal perspective.

Methods: We modelled cost-effectiveness of treatment with ranibizumab (as-needed), aflibercept (bimonthly) and bevacizumab (as-needed). Effectiveness was estimated by systematic review and meta-analysis. The drug with the most favourable cost-effectiveness profile compared to bevacizumab was used for threshold analyses. First, we determined how much we overspend per injection. Second, we calculated the required effectiveness to justify the current price and the reasonable price for a drug leading to optimal vision. Finally, we estimated how much Europe overspends if bevacizumab is not first choice.

Results: Bevacizumab treatment costs €27,087 per year, about €4,000 less than aflibercept and €6,000 less than ranibizumab. With similar effectiveness for all drugs as shown by meta-analysis, bevacizumab was the most cost-effective. Aflibercept was chosen for threshold analyses. Aflibercept costs €943 per injection, but we determined that the maximum price to be cost-effective is €533. Alternatively, at its current price, aflibercept should yield about twice the visual gain. Even when optimal vision can be achieved, the maximum price for any treatment is €37,453 per year. Most importantly, Europe overspends €335 million yearly on AMD treatment when choosing aflibercept over bevacizumab.

Conclusion: Bevacizumab is the most cost-effective treatment for AMD, yet is not the standard of care across Europe. The registered drugs ranibizumab and aflibercept lead to large overspending without additional health benefits. Health authorities should consider taking steps to implement bevacizumab into clinical practice as first choice.

Citing Articles

Efficacy, Safety, and Injection Frequency with Novel Aflibercept 8 mg in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Comparison with Existing Anti-VEGF Regimens Using a Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Wojciechowski P, Wdowiak M, Panek M, Lunk I, Carrasco J, Zhang X Ophthalmol Ther. 2025; .

PMID: 39994103 DOI: 10.1007/s40123-025-01098-y.


Global burden of low vision and blindness due to age-related macular degeneration from 1990 to 2021 and projections for 2050.

Zhang S, Ren J, Chai R, Yuan S, Hao Y BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3510.

PMID: 39695517 PMC: 11657136. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-21047-x.


Off-label use of intravitreal bevacizumab: A global conundrum.

Singh S, Saxena S, Akduman L, Meyer C Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024; 72(5):617-619.

PMID: 38661271 PMC: 11168559. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2166_23.


Effects of aflibercept and bevacizumab on cell viability, cell metabolism and inflammation in hypoxic human Müller cells.

Matsuda M, da Silva R, Roda V, Marquezini M, Monteiro M, Hamassaki D PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0300370.

PMID: 38536827 PMC: 10971667. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300370.


The impact of COVID-19 on aflibercept treatment of neovascular AMD in Sweden - data from the Swedish Macula Register.

Wickman I, Lovestam-Adrian M, Granstam E, Kjellstrom U, Schroeder M BMC Ophthalmol. 2024; 24(1):49.

PMID: 38291368 PMC: 10826194. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03326-8.


References
1.
Brown . Vision and quality-of-life. Trans Am ophthalmol soc 1999;97:473-511. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000; 129(6):833. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00513-4. View

2.
Cohen S, Mimoun G, Oubraham H, Zourdani A, Malbrel C, Quere S . Changes in visual acuity in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration treated with intravitreal ranibizumab in daily clinical practice: the LUMIERE study. Retina. 2012; 33(3):474-81. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31827b6324. View

3.
Mullard A . Can next-generation antibodies offset biosimilar competition?. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012; 11(6):426-8. DOI: 10.1038/nrd3749. View

4.
Kodjikian L, Souied E, Mimoun G, Mauget-Faysse M, Behar-Cohen F, Decullier E . Ranibizumab versus Bevacizumab for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration: Results from the GEFAL Noninferiority Randomized Trial. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(11):2300-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.06.020. View

5.
Keenan T, Kelly S, Sallam A, Mohamed Q, Tufail A, Johnston R . Incidence and baseline clinical characteristics of treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration in a well-defined region of the UK. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013; 97(9):1168-72. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303233. View