» Articles » PMID: 29771338

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of an Adherence-Promotion Intervention for Children With Leukemia: A Markov Model-Based Simulation

Overview
Date 2018 May 18
PMID 29771338
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Improving medication adherence among children with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has the potential to reduce relapse rates but requires an investment in resources. An economic evaluation is needed to understand the potential costs and benefits of delivering adherence-promotion interventions (APIs) as part of standard clinical care.

Methods: A Markov decision analytic model was used to simulate the potential incremental cost-effectiveness per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) to be gained from an API for children with B-ALL in first continuous remission compared with treatment as usual (TAU, no intervention). Model parameter estimates were informed by previously published studies. The primary outcome was incremental cost (2015 US$) per QALY gained for API compared with TAU.

Results: The model predicts the API to result in superior health outcomes (4.87 vs. 4.86 QALYs) and cost savings ($43,540.73 vs. $46,675.71) as compared with TAU, and simulations indicate that, across a range of plausible parameter estimates, there is a 95% chance that the API is more effective and less costly than TAU. The API was estimated to remain more effective and less costly than TAU in situations where the prevalence of nonadherence exceeds 32% and when API improves baseline adherence in at least 3% of patients.

Conclusions: Providing APIs to children with B-ALL may improve health outcomes and save costs over a 6-year period.

Citing Articles

NC MedAssist: Dispensing Hope throughout North Carolina.

Magennis L, Chen J, Vass B, Kidwell S, Stanfield N, Allen D N C Med J. 2024; 85(1):51-54.

PMID: 39374364 DOI: 10.18043/001c.91431.


Daily text message assessments of 6-mercaptopurine adherence and its proximal contexts in adolescents and young adults with leukemia: A pilot study.

Psihogios A, Li Y, Ahmed A, Huang J, Kersun L, Schwartz L Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020; 68(2):e28767.

PMID: 33073479 PMC: 10313157. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28767.

References
1.
. Minimal Residual Disease Evaluation in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: An Economic Analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016; 16(8):1-83. PMC: 4808717. View

2.
Felder-Puig R, Di Gallo A, Waldenmair M, Norden P, Winter A, Gadner H . Health-related quality of life of pediatric patients receiving allogeneic stem cell or bone marrow transplantation: results of a longitudinal, multi-center study. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006; 38(2):119-26. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705417. View

3.
Oskarsson T, Soderhall S, Arvidson J, Forestier E, Montgomery S, Bottai M . Relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the Nordic countries: prognostic factors, treatment and outcome. Haematologica. 2015; 101(1):68-76. PMC: 4697893. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2015.131680. View

4.
McGrady M, Ryan J, Gutierrez-Colina A, Fredericks E, Towner E, Pai A . The impact of effective paediatric adherence promotion interventions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Care Health Dev. 2015; 41(6):789-802. DOI: 10.1111/cch.12271. View

5.
Buxton M, Drummond M, van Hout B, Prince R, Sheldon T, Szucs T . Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life. Health Econ. 1997; 6(3):217-27. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199705)6:3<217::aid-hec267>3.0.co;2-w. View