» Articles » PMID: 29770080

Public Health Surveillance for the Toronto 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games

Overview
Date 2018 May 18
PMID 29770080
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Public health surveillance for previous Olympic and Paralympic Games have been described in the literature, but surveillance for regional, multisport events on a smaller scale have rarely been explored.

Objective: To describe the public health surveillance planning, implementation, results, and lessons learned from the 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Intervention: Public health surveillance planning for the Games began two years in advance and involved local, provincial and federal partners, primarily focusing on infectious disease. From June to August, 2015, enhanced public health surveillance was conducted to support situational awareness and to facilitate the detection of infectious diseases and outbreaks, environmental health hazards and impacts and other major health events.

Outcomes: No major public health incidents occurred that were associated with or a result of hosting the Games. There were two cases of reportable infectious diseases associated with the Games, and 18 public health investigations involving Games-accredited individuals (six related to vaccine-preventable diseases and 12 related to gastrointestinal illnesses or food/water safety violations). Enhanced communication mechanisms, rather than routine and syndromic surveillance systems, were the primary sources of initial notification to surveillance partners on investigations.

Conclusion: Working with its partners, Ontario created a robust public health surveillance system for the 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games. Lessons learned, as well as the relationships and capacity developed through this experience, will be applied towards public health surveillance planning for future events.

Citing Articles

A public health enhanced surveillance system for a mass gathering event.

Huot C, Paradis A, Hammond-Collins K, Belair M, Villeneuve J, Brousseau N Can Commun Dis Rep. 2019; 45(7-8):212-224.

PMID: 31355825 PMC: 6615436. DOI: 10.14745/ccdr.v45i78a05.


Comparing Twitter data to routine data sources in public health surveillance for the 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games: an ecological study.

Khan Y, Leung G, Belanger P, Gournis E, Buckeridge D, Liu L Can J Public Health. 2018; 109(3):419-426.

PMID: 29981081 PMC: 6964588. DOI: 10.17269/s41997-018-0059-0.

References
1.
Hadjichristodoulou C, Mouchtouri V, Vaitsi V, Kapoula C, Vousoureli A, Kalivitis I . Management of environmental health issues for the 2004 Athens Olympic Games: is enhanced integrated environmental health surveillance needed in every day routine operation?. BMC Public Health. 2006; 6:306. PMC: 1764887. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-306. View

2.
Kaiser R, Coulombier D . Epidemic intelligence during mass gatherings. Euro Surveill. 2007; 11(12):E061221.3. DOI: 10.2807/esw.11.51.03100-en. View

3.
Jorm L, Thackway S, Churches T, Hills M . Watching the Games: public health surveillance for the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003; 57(2):102-8. PMC: 1732372. DOI: 10.1136/jech.57.2.102. View

4.
Thackway S, Churches T, Fizzell J, Muscatello D, Armstrong P . Should cities hosting mass gatherings invest in public health surveillance and planning? Reflections from a decade of mass gatherings in Sydney, Australia. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9:324. PMC: 2754454. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-324. View

5.
Elliot A, Morbey R, Hughes H, Harcourt S, Smith S, Loveridge P . Syndromic surveillance - a public health legacy of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Public Health. 2013; 127(8):777-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.05.007. View