» Articles » PMID: 29769106

Peer Mentor Versus Teacher Delivery of a Physical Activity Program on the Effects of BMI and Daily Activity: Protocol of a School-based Group Randomized Controlled Trial in Appalachia

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2018 May 18
PMID 29769106
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Rural Appalachian populations have poorer health and fewer positive health-related behaviors compared to other United States populations. Appalachians are the most sedentary U.S. population and teens are particularly sedentary. Obesity prevention through improving physical activity is a top priority in Rural Healthy People 2020. Obesity prevalence among Appalachian teens exceeds the national rates of 13.9% and has consistently been greater than 26%. Organized sports has not been effective at improving daily physical activity or health outcomes for Appalachian teens. The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of a 10-week school-based intervention in promoting self-regulation of physical activity among adolescents not participating in organized sports. By using accelerometers, our study will measure both sedentary time and planned exercise during waking hours.

Methods: The design for this four-year study is a group-randomized controlled trial (G-RCT). We will recruit high schools in 3 waves, with 4 in Wave 1, 8 in Wave 2, and 8 in Wave 3, for a total of 20 schools. For each wave of schools, we will randomly assign half of the schools to each condition--intervention (peer-to-peer mentoring [MBA]) and comparison (teacher-led [PBA])--for a total of 10 schools in each of the two conditions by study's end. We will collect data at baseline (T), 3 months post intervention (T), and 6 months post intervention (T). Linear Mixed Models (LMMs) and Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs) will be used to test the main hypotheses. Power for this study was based the primary analysis comparing BMI outcomes at T between the groups, adjusting for baseline BMI values.

Discussion: This study provides age-appropriate lifestyle education and skill building. Peer-to-peer mentoring by local high school students and school-based tailored support strengthens sustainable behavioral change. Focusing on unique healthy-lifestyle challenges prevalent in low-resource areas such as Appalachia such as overcoming environmental, social, and psychological barriers may improve adherence to physical activity. Serving as role models, peer mentors may improve their own lifestyle behaviors, providing a dual intervention.

Trial Registration: NCT02329262 .

Citing Articles

Randomised trial of Mentored 'Planning to be Active+Family' [MPBA+F] for Appalachian youth at risk for diabetes: virtual delivery protocol.

Smith L, Petosa R, Tan A, Shankle S, Phosri Y BMJ Public Health. 2025; 2(2):e000798.

PMID: 40018636 PMC: 11816420. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000798.


The impact of family and friend support of physical activity on the participation in physical activity within Indigenous individuals in Saskatoon.

Mainra N, Ironside A, Johnson S, Rolfes T, Fatima M, Melanson K Front Sports Act Living. 2024; 6:1476949.

PMID: 39606092 PMC: 11598520. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1476949.


Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 12 to 18 years old.

Spiga F, Tomlinson E, Davies A, Moore T, Dawson S, Breheny K Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 5:CD015330.

PMID: 38763518 PMC: 11102824. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015330.pub2.


Hoosier Sport: a research protocol for a multilevel physical activity-based intervention in rural Indiana.

Greeven S, Fernandez Sola P, Kercher V, Coble C, Pope K, Erinosho T Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1243560.

PMID: 37575109 PMC: 10412824. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1243560.


The Nexus of Sports-Based Development and Education of Mental Health and Physical Fitness.

Zhang T, Liu H, Lu Y, Wang Q Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(4).

PMID: 36834432 PMC: 9967856. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043737.


References
1.
Langlois M, Petosa R, Hallam J . Why do effective smoking prevention programs work? Student changes in social cognitive theory constructs. J Sch Health. 1999; 69(8):326-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1999.tb06423.x. View

2.
Winters E, Petosa R, Charlton T . Using social cognitive theory to explain discretionary, "leisure-time" physical exercise among high school students. J Adolesc Health. 2003; 32(6):436-42. DOI: 10.1016/s1054-139x(03)00046-6. View

3.
Kruger T, Swanson M, Davis R, Wright S, Dollarhide K, Schoenberg N . Formative research conducted in rural Appalachia to inform a community physical activity intervention. Am J Health Promot. 2012; 26(3):143-51. PMC: 3252212. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.091223-QUAL-399. View

4.
Shah N, Braverman E . Measuring adiposity in patients: the utility of body mass index (BMI), percent body fat, and leptin. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e33308. PMC: 3317663. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033308. View

5.
Rich C, Griffiths L, Dezateux C . Seasonal variation in accelerometer-determined sedentary behaviour and physical activity in children: a review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9:49. PMC: 3511197. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-49. View