» Articles » PMID: 29766871

Prospective Assessment of the Risk Of Vasovagal Syncope During Driving

Overview
Date 2018 May 17
PMID 29766871
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to estimate the likelihood of a motor vehicle accident causing serious risk or harm in patients with frequent vasovagal syncope, and compare this with international accident data.

Background: Recurrent vasovagal syncope poses a risk because of fainting while driving, but prospective, benchmarked estimates of this risk have not been reported.

Methods: Data were from the POST (Prevention of Syncope Trial)-1 and -2, which were multicenter randomized studies of patients with ≥3 lifetime vasovagal syncope spells. POST-1 patients (reported in 2005) received metoprolol or placebo for ≤1 year between 1998 and 2004; POST 2 patients received fludrocortisone or placebo for ≤1 year between 2006 and 2011. Accident data were recovered from Internet reports from the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada.

Results: A total of 418 patients (age 38 ± 17 years) had a median of 10 lifetime faints and a median of 3 faints in the previous year. Total follow-up time was 323 years, or 0.77 years per person. A total of 174 subjects fainted, having a total of 615 faints. Two patients fainted while driving, without fatality or injury, with a likelihood of 0.62% per person-year. The risk of serious harm or death was <0.0035% per person-year, and 0.0018% per faint. In the general U.S., U.K., and Canadian driving populations, the risk of serious harm or death was 0.067% per driver-year, and the risk of death was 0.009%.

Conclusions: The estimated risk of serious harm or death was <0.0035% per person-year in highly symptomatic patients, less than the risk of serious harm or death in the general population. (A Randomized Clinical Trial of Fludrocortisone for Vasovagal Syncope: The Second Prevention of Syncope Trial [POST II]; NCT00118482).

Citing Articles

Syncope and subsequent traffic crash: A responsibility analysis.

Staples J, Erdelyi S, Merchant K, Yip C, Khan M, Redelmeier D PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0279710.

PMID: 36656813 PMC: 9851499. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279710.


Recommendations for driving after implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation and the use of a wearable cardioverter defibrillator : Different viewpoints around the world.

Cooper M, Berent T, Auer J, Berent R Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2020; 132(23-24):770-781.

PMID: 32435868 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-020-01675-0.


Transient loss of consciousness assessment in a University Hospital: From diagnosis to prognosis.

Silva M, Godinho A, Freitas J Porto Biomed J. 2020; 1(3):118-123.

PMID: 32258560 PMC: 6806740. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbj.2016.07.001.


[Syncope and fitness to drive].

Klein H Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2018; 29(2):214-218.

PMID: 29766266 DOI: 10.1007/s00399-018-0565-z.


Driving restrictions in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators and pacemakers.

Watanabe E, Abe H, Watanabe S J Arrhythm. 2017; 33(6):594-601.

PMID: 29255507 PMC: 5728711. DOI: 10.1016/j.joa.2017.02.003.