» Articles » PMID: 29765211

Usability and Acceptability of Technology for Community-dwelling Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: a Systematic Literature Review

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2018 May 17
PMID 29765211
Citations 77
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The objective of this review was to obtain an overview of the technologies that have been explored with older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia (MCI/D), current knowledge on the usability and acceptability of such technologies, and how people with MCI/D and their family carers (FCs) were involved in these studies.

Materials And Methods: Primary studies published between 2007 and 2017 that explored the use of technologies for community-dwelling people with MCI/D were identified through five databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, AMED, and CINAHL. Twenty-nine out of 359 papers met the criteria for eligibility. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for quality assessment.

Results: A wide range of technologies was presented in the 29 studies, sorted into four domains: 1) safe walking indoors and outdoors; 2) safe living; 3) independent living; and 4) entertainment and social communication. The current state of knowledge regarding usability and acceptability reveals that even if researchers are aware of these concepts and intend to measure usability and acceptability, they seem difficult to assess. Terms such as "user friendliness" and "acceptance" were used frequently. User participation in the 29 studies was high. Persons with MCI/D, FCs, and staff/other older adults were involved in focus groups, workshops, and interviews as part of the preimplementation process.

Conclusion: Research regarding technologies to support people with MCI/D seems optimistic, and a wide range of technologies has been evaluated in homes with people with MCI/D and their FCs. A major finding was the importance of including people with MCI/D and their FCs in research, in order to learn about required design features to enhance usability and acceptability. Surprisingly, very few studies reported on the consequences of technology use with regard to quality of life, occupational performance, or human dignity.

Citing Articles

Mobile App for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases During Home-Based Exercise Care: Usability Study.

Chien S JMIR Hum Factors. 2024; 11:e60049.

PMID: 39546767 PMC: 11607552. DOI: 10.2196/60049.


Digital Storytelling for People With Cognitive Impairment Using Available Mobile Apps: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.

Zhu D, Al Mahmud A, Liu W, Wang D JMIR Aging. 2024; 7:e64525.

PMID: 39446478 PMC: 11544346. DOI: 10.2196/64525.


Navigating Challenges and Opportunities in Community-Based Interventions for Promoting Active Aging: A Systematic Review of the Roles of Technology.

Chang F, Wang G, Gu Z Innov Aging. 2024; 8(10):igae077.

PMID: 39391810 PMC: 11464989. DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igae077.


Ethics, design, and implementation criteria of digital assistive technologies for people with dementia from a multiple stakeholder perspective: a qualitative study.

Kohler S, Perry J, Biernetzky O, Kirste T, Teipel S BMC Med Ethics. 2024; 25(1):84.

PMID: 39068472 PMC: 11282641. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01080-6.


Technology Usability for People Living With Dementia: Concept Analysis.

Chien S, Zaslavsky O, Berridge C JMIR Aging. 2024; 7:e51987.

PMID: 38959053 PMC: 11255540. DOI: 10.2196/51987.


References
1.
Leuty V, Boger J, Young L, Hoey J, Mihailidis A . Engaging older adults with dementia in creative occupations using artificially intelligent assistive technology. Assist Technol. 2013; 25(2):72-9. DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2012.715113. View

2.
Malinowsky C, Almkvist O, Kottorp A, Nygard L . Ability to manage everyday technology: a comparison of persons with dementia or mild cognitive impairment and older adults without cognitive impairment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010; 5(6):462-9. DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2010.496098. View

3.
Hattink B, Meiland F, Overmars-Marx T, de Boer M, Ebben P, van Blanken M . The electronic, personalizable Rosetta system for dementia care: exploring the user-friendliness, usefulness and impact. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014; 11(1):61-71. DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2014.932022. View

4.
Assis L, Tirado M, Pertence A, Pereira L, Mancini M . Evaluation of cognitive technologies in geriatric rehabilitation: a case study pilot project. Occup Ther Int. 2010; 17(2):53-63. DOI: 10.1002/oti.290. View

5.
Kenigsberg P, Aquino J, Berard A, Gzil F, Andrieu S, Banerjee S . Dementia beyond 2025: Knowledge and uncertainties. Dementia (London). 2015; 15(1):6-21. DOI: 10.1177/1471301215574785. View